I don't know if he could or not. And neither do you. First off, Rodgers didn't take his team to 15-1. He took them to 14-1. Flynn was responsible for the last game. Which makes one wonder if it was all Rodgers or the supporting cast around him?
If you take the top ten QB's in the League by passer rating the last two year only 5 names show up, Rodgers, Roethlisberger, P Manning, Kaepernick, and Wilson. So for two years running this guy has been in the top ten of QB's in the league based on rating, but because he doesn't throw for 4,500+ yards he is not to be considered a top QB. He is nothing more than a game manager. That's one hell of a game manager. So be it. We will have to agree to disagree on this . I think he is more than a game manager. And while his skill set may not be the same as Rodgers, NO QB's skill sets are the same, his skill set is good enough to keep him in the top tier of QB's for a while. But I could be wrong. Time will tell. And if this year he has Harvin, Rice and Tate to throw to and puts up 50 passing TD's, what will that say about his skill set. (I don't expect this, because that is not how Seattle is built to play.)