Innocent until proven guilty is the legal standard and rightly so, but that doesn't apply to public opinion and IMO it shouldn't. Otherwise you would have to say it was wrong to conclude OJ Simpson guilty before the verdict - and after that travesty of justice, thereafter. Of course that doesn't mean jumping to conclusions before knowing any, most, or all of the facts is right. IMO we just don't know enough about what happened to draw any conclusions at this point.
Fans can dismiss Walden as not very good but no one can argue the coaching staff, from McCarthy to Capers to Greene have seen him as their best option. For example like many of you, I was excited about the potential of So'oto during pre season but if the staff thought he was a better option at ROLB than Walden he would have been playing, right? Same with Brad Jones. And Zombo can't seem to stay on the field. BTW, I agree with McGinn and see Walden as better than many of my fellow Packers fans.
GBPack2010 can you reconcile your opinion that the Packers "don't allow that kind of behavior to represent them" with the facts surrounding Jolly's interactions with law enforcement? Or is just being charged with assault more serious than being charged with a second-degree drug possession felony? Remember, in the summer of 2008 the Packers organization knew Jolly was arrested in a vehicle he shared with three "friends" with criminal records, along with an unregistered hand gun, marijuana, and 'purple drank' (codeine). Except for the amount of codeine in the drank, I don't think any of those facts were in dispute. And the Packers knew that "party" was taking place in an area known for drug dealing and violence and they knew that some in the Houston PD suspected Jolly of dealing drugs. Jolly started 32 regular season games after being charged and the Packers took no action against him until the league suspended him.