1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

are their any FA CB's??

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by packer_backer, Dec 21, 2009.

  1. packer_backer

    packer_backer Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    83
    Ratings:
    +0
    chris mccalister??

    the thought of mcnabb/jackson warner/fitz n boldin does not look good for this team in the playoffs with this secondary. woodson cant cover everything.
     
  2. SCpackerfan

    SCpackerfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    329
    Ratings:
    +21
    Its mainly Jarret Bush, I dont blame Bell for that last second TD at all. The coverage was there, the problem was we only brought 3 pass rushers and gave Ben all day to throw that perfect pass. If we get rid of Bush I think our secondary would improve tremendously.
     
  3. PackersRS

    PackersRS Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,471
    Ratings:
    +980
    It's ridiculous NOT to at least talk with McCalister.

    The Steelers just won a SB with an awful OL, so we could very well win with Bush.

    But that's just a dumb move.
     
  4. NYPacker

    NYPacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,582
    Ratings:
    +38
    They won the SB with a bad OL but a mobile QB and top 3 defense. Hmmm that sound familiar....
     
  5. Green_Bay_Packers

    Green_Bay_Packers Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2007
    Messages:
    5,640
    Ratings:
    +113
    The New England Patroits, is that the answer? >_>

    Guys Im stuck with this quiz question :(
     
  6. PackersRS

    PackersRS Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,471
    Ratings:
    +980
    They didn't face a top pass rushing unit in the playoffs. That's my point. They won the SB and had a blalant flaw in their team. But they weren't exploited.

    We WILL face a top passing unit if we make the playoffs. Which is our weak link, a team with 3 or more very good receivers.

    I'm not like some other guys, that already know the future. I'm not saying that we WILL LOSE if we face them. But we might, because of Bush and Crosby.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm onboard with the Pack and I've drank all the kool-aid, and I've said before that if the Steelers game was a must win, we would've won it, despite the refs, despite Crosby and Bush.

    But why the hell would you expose your team keeping guys like that?

    Why not make it easier to win????? We sure have the cap to do it, and it wouldn't be much costly.
     
  7. DILLIGAFF

    DILLIGAFF Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Messages:
    603
    Ratings:
    +4
    With Bush TT went out of his way to keep him. Its too late in the year to make a change. I think Capers understands what our secondary is capable of and will game plan around their weakness. Thats all that can be done at this point.
     
  8. NYPacker

    NYPacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,582
    Ratings:
    +38
    And this is why the packers aren't a true contending team. Great teams don't show up only when they need to but during all 16 games of the season. I'll say it now and i've said it before packers will go to playoffs but come out at the losing end at the wild card game.
     
  9. PackersRS

    PackersRS Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,471
    Ratings:
    +980
    IMHO that's BS. Great teams win when they're supposed to. Not every game. 1997 we lost to a 1-10 Colts team. We went to the SB. 2007 we lost to the Bears twice, and still went to the NFCC game.
     
  10. SCpackerfan

    SCpackerfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    329
    Ratings:
    +21
    Yea that statement is ridiculous to say, Cardinals last year?
     
  11. Cartunist23

    Cartunist23 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    48
    Ratings:
    +4
    Green Bay Packers coaches resolve to fix pass defense | greenbaypressgazette.com | Green Bay Press-Gazette

    “Changing personnel frankly is not an option, and it’s really not an interest of mine,” McCarthy said. “We’ve had our share of injuries like everybody. Tryouts are over. We’ve got game number 15 coming up, and we need to do some of the things that we didn’t do very well (on Sunday) better, and if we need to adjust some things based on who’s coming in here and what the matchup is across from them this week, then we’ll do that. We have answers for the issues that we encountered. We didn’t handle it very well (on Sunday).”

    It makes me sad to see that. I guess bringing someone else in isn't even on their radar. real smart
     
  12. SCpackerfan

    SCpackerfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    329
    Ratings:
    +21
    That's not good. Not good at all.
     
  13. NYPacker

    NYPacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,582
    Ratings:
    +38
    That's Mccarthy just answering to reporter's questions about who is to blame for the loss. The packers are always looking for new players so i think ted will bring sum players in.
     

Share This Page