1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!

A WR in 2nd rd ???? we need DEFENSE !!!

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by ohiopacker, Apr 23, 2005.

  1. ohiopacker

    ohiopacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Messages:
    184
    Ratings:
    +0
    ??????????
     
  2. fondypackfan

    fondypackfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Messages:
    219
    Ratings:
    +0
    Honestly what the hell is going on what Crowder not on the board am I missing that we need defense here!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!? They better be trading this pick...
     
  3. wils0646

    wils0646 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2005
    Messages:
    187
    Ratings:
    +1
    I seriously do not understand this. We need defense, and he gets a kick reterner. Unbelievable.
     
  4. sixone220

    sixone220 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Messages:
    688
    Ratings:
    +1
    i couldn't be more pissed right now. we could have had 2 solid defensive players with a chance to start and we get an unknown db and a freakin wr
     
  5. fondypackfan

    fondypackfan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Messages:
    219
    Ratings:
    +0
    I think Ted Thompson quit and Sherman is running the show again apparently we had an adequate defense last year don't need to anyone that can come in and help on D. I came into today with high hopes I agreed with the first round pick becuz you had to take Rodgers since he fell that far we could have had Cody, Crowder, Justin Miller with the first 2nd round pick and we take another small corner from a d-2 school and then a WR???
     
  6. HatestheEagles084

    HatestheEagles084 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,423
    Ratings:
    +1
    ill agree there, these picks have sherman's fingerprints all over them. Not one but two royal screwups when good value was on the board, i was speechless.

    Let me defend Terrence Murphy for a second, I wouldve taken a reciever, maybe round 4 or 5, I don't like Chatman as a 4th reciever, when our recieving corps were thinned out against Minnesota last year, we struggled horribly. I like him as a kick returner because Chatman is only average there.
     
  7. sixone220

    sixone220 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Messages:
    688
    Ratings:
    +1
    i'll agree that we can use a wr, but like you said, not for a few rds.
     
  8. rabidgopher04

    rabidgopher04 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,467
    Ratings:
    +0
    Yes, I'll agree. If y'all hadn't noticed our kick returning has sucked the years after Desmond Howard (with the exception of Allen Rossum).

    So this guy had better be good. Let's just trust TT for now. ;)
     
  9. LOREN

    LOREN Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    37
    Ratings:
    +0
    heres the real story, after teddy made the nice pick at 24.

    sherman got his over paid flunkies 94 and 97 to put teddy in the closet, with nno one blocking 94 and 97 they had teddy in hand in under 5 minutes flat

    then sherman took over becasue teddy was missing and continued to make stupid picks and an even worse trade

    how else could the 51 and 58 picks be explained

    even throwing darts at the board with draft names would have done a better job 1000 times in a row with your eyes closed, than this 3 pick move ar 51 58 and the trade

    if thats the way it is going to be, minnesota and chicago must be paying teds salary
     
  10. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Messages:
    11,903
    Ratings:
    +8
    I'm ashamed to be in the same category as a Packers fan as you.
     

Share This Page