I came across this tonight and thought you guys would love to pick this apart.
charles woodson versus champ bailey: THE FACTS - CBSSports.com Message Boards
"Champ bailey came out a year after charles woodson, but when we talk about the 1997 season we talk about how WRONG the heisman voters got the voting that year. We all know Randy Moss was FAR AWAY the best player in college football that year or do I need to post his tds in 2 years of college???? Didn't think so. When 20 to 30 years from now how will people remember those 3 players?
1. Peyton Manning Hall of FAME
2 Randy Moss HALL OF FAME
3 Charles Woodson, good career only two great years.
That is how history will remember it and it shows again that the only reason woodson won the heisman was the media loving up on michigan and the population thing again.
Now back to champ bailey and charles woodson. Bailey has 46 INTs, woodson has 45, but bailey has 9, that is right 9 pro bowls.
champ bailey showed in 1998 that he was the best TWO WAY player over woodson any day and all day, just go pull up the stats, not even comparable except woodson had more INT's.
Champ bailey will be in the hall of fame, woodson will not
Also no way should woodson have gotten defensive player of the year last year, he got lit up by good wrs in big games, REVIS SHUT DOWN EVERYONE."
Woodson has been getting shafted by everyone even though he dominated the DPOY voting last season. This is no exception.
charles woodson versus champ bailey: THE FACTS - CBSSports.com Message Boards
"Champ bailey came out a year after charles woodson, but when we talk about the 1997 season we talk about how WRONG the heisman voters got the voting that year. We all know Randy Moss was FAR AWAY the best player in college football that year or do I need to post his tds in 2 years of college???? Didn't think so. When 20 to 30 years from now how will people remember those 3 players?
1. Peyton Manning Hall of FAME
2 Randy Moss HALL OF FAME
3 Charles Woodson, good career only two great years.
That is how history will remember it and it shows again that the only reason woodson won the heisman was the media loving up on michigan and the population thing again.
Now back to champ bailey and charles woodson. Bailey has 46 INTs, woodson has 45, but bailey has 9, that is right 9 pro bowls.
champ bailey showed in 1998 that he was the best TWO WAY player over woodson any day and all day, just go pull up the stats, not even comparable except woodson had more INT's.
Champ bailey will be in the hall of fame, woodson will not
Also no way should woodson have gotten defensive player of the year last year, he got lit up by good wrs in big games, REVIS SHUT DOWN EVERYONE."
Woodson has been getting shafted by everyone even though he dominated the DPOY voting last season. This is no exception.