OP
OP
Deleted member 6794
Guest
And if you want facts about how teams win and lose with their QB's, here are some:
Colts without Manning 2-14. Chiefs now one of the best with Smith. Cardinals now with Palmer.
So tell me more about how the Packers should be better without Rodgers and his backup. Why don't you give me facts to show how teams do well with their third/fourth option?
The vast majority of the time, teams win with good QB play and lose with bad QB play. That's a fact.
Colts fired their GM after going 2-14, you obviously haven't watched any Chiefs or Cardinals games this season.
While I agree that it's very tough to be a Super Bowl contender with mediocre QB play a lot of these teams would be able to do better than 1-4-1 vs. mostly bad teams.
Gesendet von meinem iPhone mit Tapatalk