Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

The 2012 Packer Season Is OVER!!!

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by Wood Chipper, Sep 9, 2012.

  1. Shawnsta3 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    713
    Location:
    Manawa & Shawano, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +197 / 34 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1996
    Thats saying a lot for a team that's went 3-3 in its last 6 games.

    Yes it's the same offense, but you have to improve each year. I'm not sure how much they improves. Defenses started to figure us out last year and that will only improve this year.

    Yeah our defense will be a little better this year. And our pass rush will be improved. But to make any serious difference your putting a lot on some rookies. Even the Packers dont look for much out of their rookies until year 2.
  2. MiamiBeachPacker Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    384
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +131 / 8 / -0
    I think it would be much more likely to lose to the Redskins
  3. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    Really? Sound ball? Did you watch them today? 250 total yards... 4-12 on third down... 2.6 yards per rush.
  4. Shawnsta3 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    713
    Location:
    Manawa & Shawano, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +197 / 34 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1996
    Whatever. You have your views, I have mine. We'll see at the end of the year who's right. We're both Packer fans here.
  5. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    Okay, so we have to improve on scoring the 2nd most points ever? We have to improve but the Saints don't? (You said they're exactly the same as last year.) How does that work?
  6. MiamiBeachPacker Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    384
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    Ratings Received:
    +131 / 8 / -0
    I can't say we wont lose to the Saints or Giants because there is definitely a chance we will. What I can say is that we have a pretty good chance to beat both of them
  7. Shawnsta3 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    713
    Location:
    Manawa & Shawano, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +197 / 34 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1996
    By that the Packers would be playing the worst sound ball of all. Compare our stats to St. Louis's I'm interested to see how they compare.
  8. greenandgold I'm Dirty Hairy Callahan

    Member Since:
    Jul 8, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,613
    Location:
    Mobile, AL.
    Ratings Received:
    +433 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1962
    I'm not panicking and giving up total hope just yet. But I'm sort of mad we spent all them draft choices on beefing up the defense, and so far it hasn't seem to help any. Clay don't get no help again this year, he can't carry the defense by himself.
  9. Shawnsta3 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    713
    Location:
    Manawa & Shawano, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +197 / 34 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1996
    We both have the same offense's but the Saints added Nick Toon and 2 O lineman in the draft. They should make a minimal effect. Not sure we really added much at all in offense. No draft pick on offense made the roster. And I'm not sure if Saturday is an upgrade over Wells or if Benson is an upgrade over anybody, or even the best RB on our roster.
  10. Crazy Packers Fan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 21, 2010
    Message Count:
    362
    Location:
    Dreadful Pittsburgh, PA
    Ratings Received:
    +98 / 0 / -0
    There's no reason to panic yet. The 49ers are most people's favorite to win the Super Bowl, right? Now obviously, I expect the Packers to win the Super Bowl, so for them to be inferior to anyone is unacceptable. But one loss isn't going to undo our season; in fact, it may help the team see its errors and correct them.

    However, if the Packers lose to the Bears, then the panic button must be pressed. There would be the possibility of everyone in the division being at 2-0 and the Packers at 0-2, not to mention all sorts of other bad things to go with the start. Can this team start out 1-4 like in 2004 and come back to make the playoffs? Yes, but there's a whole lot of things to correct.
  11. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    Compare the 49ers to the Lions. I'm interested to see how they compare too.
  12. Shawnsta3 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    713
    Location:
    Manawa & Shawano, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +197 / 34 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1996
    Yes, but of our offense is so great we should still have no problem scoring right?

    And playing a good defense is no excuse to turn over the ball.
  13. PFanCan That's MISTER Cheesehead, to you.

    Member Since:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Message Count:
    988
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Ratings Received:
    +436 / 6 / -0
    I will take that bet. What odds will you give, seeing that it is highly likely you are correct. We can use one of the betting houses in Vegas to handle this transaction fair and square. Name your amount, too. Up to low four zeroes is ok with me.
  14. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    They won't have ANY effect. They're all on the Saints IR. :roflmao:
  15. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    Wrong.

    I've said it for many years. Great defense trumps great offense. It's been true for as long as I've watched football. It remains true today.

    BTW, if our offense isn't great, nobody's is.
  16. Shawnsta3 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    713
    Location:
    Manawa & Shawano, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +197 / 34 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1996
    you made my point.
  17. Croak Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2010
    Message Count:
    2,463
    Ratings Received:
    +701 / 3 / -0
    Somebody call the waaaaambulance! Stick a fork in 'em, their done. :rolleyes:
  18. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    So you're saying there are no great offenses... gotcha.
  19. PFanCan That's MISTER Cheesehead, to you.

    Member Since:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Message Count:
    988
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Ratings Received:
    +436 / 6 / -0
    Remember that play where Clay blew into the backfield and nearly tackled the RB for a loss? Looked like he totally ruined that play. But, the RB then went on to dance through a few missed tackles for a nice gain.

    That sucked.
  20. Shawnsta3 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    713
    Location:
    Manawa & Shawano, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +197 / 34 / -1
    Packer Fan Since:
    1996
    No, by saying that great defenses beat great offenses. Our defense isn't "great" yet to beat most great offenses.
  21. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    Wait a second, you're going to praise Matthews for"nearly tackling the RB" and then hose the ones who "missed tackles"? Am I missing something here?
  22. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    The Saints defense is no better than ours. What's your point? I don't think anyone has said the Saints game won't be a high scoring affair on both sides of the ball.
  23. GreenBlood Banned

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,705
    Ratings Received:
    +660 / 41 / -3
    Seriously? After ONE GAME?
  24. DevilDon Inclement Weather Fan

    Member Since:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,209
    Ratings Received:
    +351 / 5 / -3
    Well it's clear the season is a lost one. I'm watching the rest of the games though to see where we need to draft. You know... if someone other than Rodgers is SB MVP we can say we are okay at that position.
    I did see alot of positives in this game. Let's admit that Harbaugh really had this game setup. FB at the wide WR position and TE inside of him split? They had a tons of stuff planned against our personnel and not vice-versa. They got Perry out in the flat in coverage against Crabtree a few times. We're not going to win those battles this early in the season. Great coaching on the 9ers side. Really an admirable offensive game plan. I never saw all this coming and I doubt the Packers coaches did either. However, it is the first game and this isn't the same 9ers team from last season. If the Packers had any idea what they'd be doing, any film at all it might have been a different game.
    I thought Finley would be the difference maker. Those 9er LBs are for real. They really took him out.
    Still, I"m not worried if the Packers have to face them again. Packers had pressure, good pressure. I wish I could figure out why we can't stop the run.
    I hate to say it but I think we were out coached this game. I don't believe their players are superior to ours. 9ers had a masterful gameplan and they played it in the first game. Now it's on film. Would have loved to play them 2nd, 3rd or even 4th week. I think they obsessed about this game all offseason.
    As for the refs, they were pretty bad, but I have to believe they were bad for both sides. NO question the challenges were correctly upheld. Nobody can ever say if the block in the back on Cobb's return would have been seen by the regular refs. We saw it on TV but can't be certain some ref would have caught it otherwise.
    Cobb looks electric, the secondary looked confused at times but experience will change that. The front 7 looked good against the pass. Rodgers will dial it in. Benson will improve in one back sets against lesser D's. (Their guys came out of nowhere on some runs, good lord).
    This Packers team is one in transition. No question they are not the same team. But I think this is the Packers future, once they put it together they will be dangerous. Will it be in the next 3? I don't know but I"m really pumped about the potential of this team. No chance this team goes 0-4 but wow, they are going to be a ton of fun to watch late in the season.
    People always talk about what's better about this team or that from last season and I think we saw in Cobb and Perry the beginnings of a new identity for the Packers this season.
  25. PFanCan That's MISTER Cheesehead, to you.

    Member Since:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Message Count:
    988
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Ratings Received:
    +436 / 6 / -0
    Yes, you are missing something.

    Matthews penetrated the backfield while dominating his blocker shoving him 5 yards backwards. Matthews was a huge disruption to the planned flow of the offensive play causing the RB to run several yards deeper and burning crucial seconds of time.

    The rest of the Packer defensive squad should have been able to capitalize on Clay's effort, but they didn't. Instead, they remained stuck behind their blockers while being pushed backward. Their pursuit was a fraction of what Matthews was able to do.

Share This Page