bozz_2006
Cheesehead
why is everyone trying to pinpoint the success down to one person? think about how ridiculous that is.
bozz_2006 said:why is everyone trying to pinpoint the success down to one person? think about how ridiculous that is.
Exactly.
By the way, where do you place all the blame when things go south? :wink:
How many are willing to "man up" and admit they were wrong about Favre after viciously attacking him?
pack_in_black said:How many are willing to "man up" and admit they were wrong about Favre after viciously attacking him?
I fell off my chair laughing when I read that! :shock:
and Fuzznuts hijacks a 'pat on the back to TT' thread and turns it into a Favre thread. Shocker.
I disagree Porky.
This is where I have a big problem with some people here.
What you're saying Porky, is that McCarthy is the reason for Favre's success. How many people here were calling for Favre's head and saying that he "lost it", and should retire a few short months ago? How many wanted Aaron Rodgers to start over Favre? (and I have a feeling that a couple still do! )
How many are willing to "man up" and admit they were wrong about Favre after viciously attacking him?
Why won't you people admit that the Packers sucked in '04, '05, and somewhat, in '06? It's as if some people would rather attack and blame Favre rather than admit that the Packers were just not that good, and that Favre had no team around him, whatsoever. What...all of a sudden Favre un-sucks again? He is un-washed up?
Saying that it's because McCarthy is controlling him like some automaton is naive at best. What McCarthy is doing is being smart enough to know that Brett Favre can run this offense without the micro-manageing, control freak coaching style of those two simps, Sherman and Rossley. I give him credit for that! (So he asserting less control over Favre, not more!)
2) Yes. Saying Favre is an automaton is silly.
I thought we were all Packer fans here...
I "mann'ed up" and admitted that I was pretty much wrong about TT. I wonder why you (and some others here) have such a hard time doing the same thing regarding Brett Favre..?
pack_in_black said:Sure, I said he should be traded, benched, retired, or any of those. Was I wrong? Hell yes, and I'm glad I was. Was it "vicious"? Hell no. Do I need to "man up" and apologize via the internet? Um.....no.
on and on and on, on , on and on, the beat don't stop 'till the break of dawn.
Now what you hear is not a test, i'm rapping to the beat........
op:
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
WHO SANG IT, WHAT SONG DID IT SAMPLE?
The Packers are 8-1. everyone involved has stepped up and contributed.
Sugar Hill Gang
"Good Times" by Chic.
pack_in_black said:Dude, everyone who wasn't a Favre-firster wondered openly whether the man's skills had eroded.
Not being a total homer for one player on a team of 53 does not disqualify someone from being a fan. That's just a retarded notion.
The general consensus from objective observers was that his skills, at age 37 or whatever it is, may have eroded.
If "man up" means unabashedly kissing a player's ***, I guess I'm not quite ready, nor will I ever be.
:thumbsup:
bozz_2006 said:Exactly.
By the way, where do you place all the blame when things go south? :wink:
my wife
Zombieslayer said:2) Yes. Saying Favre is an automaton is silly.
So your not confused. I didn't say that. Read my post.