He's not wrong. Anyone with two eyes could see the offense was off from the get go. 8 drops, 4 turnovers = Packers beating themselves.
What exactly did he say that was dumb? I'd say he was right on. Just like Spartachris said, 8 dropped passes, 4 turnovers and that hail Mary is what got us beat. If we played even an average game we would've beat the giants.I love Clay just as much as the next guy, but he does say some pretty dumb **** sometimes.
But it was true... if we just stopped that hail mary and caught every ball that Rodgers threw, we would have won that game.I love Clay just as much as the next guy, but he does say some pretty dumb **** sometimes.
If the queen had balls she'd be the King. Bottom line is your defense sucked against us both games and its pretty hard to win without a good defense. Your offense WASN'T as good as it was all year, I totally agree with you on that one, but every team makes mistakes over the course of a game. Fumbles, I'm sorry, but CANNOT count as "being sloppy"; the ball was stripped by a Giants defender.But it was true... if we just stopped that hail mary and caught every ball that Rodgers threw, we would have won that game.
But it was true... if we just stopped that hail mary and caught every ball that Rodgers threw, we would have won that game.
It's not what he said, it's that he said it at all. It may be true, but when you say it you just sound like a punk.
“Thank you for giving us the game, Clay,” Tuck deadpanned yesterday. “I appreciate it a lot.”
“With what our offense had done that season, I think we had, especially defensively, a false sense of security about what they were gonna do.
“Maybe we should have panicked. But we didn’t. We just felt like, ‘Hey, at the end of the day, the offense will put up enough points, we’ll win the game and move on.’ That was probably to our detriment.”