Jess
Movement!
That would be the Vikings, Lions, and Bears.
You can talk about whatever these losers do here.
You can talk about whatever these losers do here.
Still afraid the Vikings take Clausen.
The Lions picked a monster player, and a RB that has the potential to be great. But for the second year in a row, they leave the draft probably without a LT, and their OL is terrible...
And the Bears, well, they ruined their franchise last season...
Yeah, it wasn't... But who did they have at RB? Arguably the greatest ever in Barry Sanders... As much as I like Best, it's not the case...Stole the words right out of my mouth... but who knows.. maybe Al Davis will become smarter overnight, and trade for the first pick of the second draft..and get Clausen. Doubtful.
Lions are a potential threat, yeah they're O-Line does suck...but it wasn't the greatest 12 years ago either. Their Secondary is still up the the air I believe, besides Delmas.
The Bears... still suck!
Yeah, it wasn't... But who did they have at RB? Arguably the greatest ever in Barry Sanders... As much as I like Best, it's not the case...
Also as a ND fan I disagree vehemently...As someone who watched ND games for the last 5 years...TRUST ME it's not a surprise that Clausen is still on the board. You're given EVERY advantage imaginable *Including being left back a grade to get bigger*, put in a PRO-STYLE offense, and you pretty much fall flat on your face? It wouldn't surprise me to either see A. Clausen get signed as an undrafted free-agent or B. Go to a crappy team like Buffalo in round 2 and end up out of the league in 3 years.
I thought the kittens did really well, playmakers in Best and Suh, and solid guys in Spievy and Jason Fox...I give the queens a D+, they didnt address their needs very well at all, still have no QB and they got gerheart LOL. Not really afraid of another running back with the way our Run Defense is going.( they needed a QB and just about everposistion on Defefnse, as well as their O-line is aging.
Cubs: D-, they got nobodies.
Kittens: B+ Suh n Best addresses two glaring needs and they will probably come right in and play day 1 so, the Lions are really the only other team in the NFC north that got good value.
I was really rooting for Toby Gerhart to do well in the NFL.................until the ******** picked him.
It's like when they picked Chad Greenway. I'm a huge Iowa Hawkeye fan and always want Iowa players to do well in the pros. I hate having to root against Greenway.
Cubs: D-, they got nobodies.
Major Wright is one hell of a FS
I love this. Just for the hell of it. The average age on the Packer starting O-line at the end of last year compared to the average age of the Vikings O-line at the end of the year. Question, which member of the Packer O-line from the end of the year won't be starting this year to change the numbers?I give the queens a D+, they didnt address their needs very well at all, still have no QB and they got gerheart LOL. Not really afraid of another running back with the way our Run Defense is going.( they needed a QB and just about everposistion on Defefnse, as well as their O-line is aging.
Cubs: D-, they got nobodies.
Kittens: B+ Suh n Best addresses two glaring needs and they will probably come right in and play day 1 so, the Lions are really the only other team in the NFC north that got good value.
True. Your OL isn't aging. Birk was, and he was let go. Hutchingson is. And the only one I can remember. But an important one. Don't know who's his replacement...I love this. Just for the hell of it. The average age on the Packer starting O-line at the end of last year compared to the average age of the Vikings O-line at the end of the year. Question, which member of the Packer O-line from the end of the year won't be starting this year to change the numbers?
Packer O-line. 29.2
Vikings O-line. 28.4
Now, who's O-line is aging?
yes, he's younger. But we got Bulaga and Lang to fill in for them, when they go...Hutch it the oldest, yet he is younger than both Clifton and Tauscher.
As to the QB, I wish they would have drafted a QB. I didn't want Clausen. I was hoping they would get some one down the line who could be brought along for a few years. Now as to relying on Brett or Jackson, at this point it does not bother me. With Jackson not playing much last year and having the opportunity to see how Brett worked I hoped he is smart enough to have learned something. If Brett does not come back until after training camp, which is what I think, that gives Jackson and Rosenfels time to work with the team.
And as to how long does it take for the QB to develop? Depends on the QB.
eh he played in one hell of a system, I'm not so sure he is one hell of an FS.
Actually, I do. I wish they never would have pulled T. Jack after the second game in 2008. I thought he should have been allowed to play. At least we would know for sure if he can do it. Now we just have a bunch of people who say he sucks and a bunch who think he can do it. I know its a moot point to most, but if you look at his numbers every 4 games since he came into the league they are continually getting better. And as Packer fans I would think you guys would love to see him start.yes, he's younger. But we got Bulaga and Lang to fill in for them, when they go...
And do you thrust them? To be your QB?
Actually, I do. I wish they never would have pulled T. Jack after the second game in 2008. I thought he should have been allowed to play. At least we would know for sure if he can do it. Now we just have a bunch of people who say he sucks and a bunch who think he can do it. I know its a moot point to most, but if you look at his numbers every 4 games since he came into the league they are continually getting better. And as Packer fans I would think you guys would love to see him start.
But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong. :suicide2: