Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

2007 Opponents Determined

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by Ryan, Jan 5, 2007.

  1. Ryan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Message Count:
    3,371
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    Green Bay Packers 2007 Opponents
    Home: Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Minnesota Vikings, Philadelphia Eagles, Washington Redskins, Carolina Panthers, Oakland Raiders, San Diego Chargers

    Away: Chicago Bears, Detroit Lions, Minnesota Vikings, Dallas Cowboys, New York Giants, St. Louis Rams, Denver Broncos, Kansas City Chiefs


    The scheduling formula implemented in 2002 with realignment guarantees that all teams play each other on a regular, rotating basis.

    Under the formula, every team within a division plays 16 games as follows:

    - Home and away against its three division opponents (6 games).

    - The four teams from another division within its conference on a rotating three-year cycle (4 games).

    - The four teams from a division in the other conference on a rotating four-year cycle (4 games).

    - Two intraconference games based on the prior year's standings (2 games). These games match a first-place team against the first-place teams in the two same-conference divisions the team is not scheduled to play that season. The second-place, third-place, and fourth-place teams in a conference are matched in the same way each year.
  2. steveGB Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Message Count:
    164
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    looking forward to playing denver
  3. CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,486
    Location:
    Citrus Heights CA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
  4. GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,249
    Location:
    the Northpole
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    hahaha double thread by Ryan!!!!
  5. Heatherthepackgirl Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,274
    Location:
    Fontana, CA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I wished they would play Chargers, 49er's, Raiders just one in California so we could go and see a game close to home...Looks to me like a pretty good schedule..
  6. CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,486
    Location:
    Citrus Heights CA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    If only the 49'ers had defeated the Cardinals in week 16.
    Nature Grass, good football weather all season, good place for visitors, I can see the game etc.

    Chargers and Raiders there was no choice.
  7. Ryan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Message Count:
    3,371
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
  8. Krazygangsta Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 27, 2006
    Message Count:
    583
    Location:
    Montreal
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    lol were going 16-0 :D lol jk jk looks like a tought schedule but we can pull it out if our defense plays like it was playing last games and if we get some offense in the draft with robinson back :p damnnn what a team
  9. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Judging schedules so far ahead always ends up the opposite I've learned.

    If you think its an easy schedule, it will be tough.

    If you think its a tough schedule, it will be easy.
  10. Ryan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Message Count:
    3,371
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    Hmmm looks damn difficult and we won't be making the playoffs or winning the SB.... Too bad really.

Share This Page