Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="doughsellz" data-source="post: 245198" data-attributes="member: 1158">I've asked myself & also posed these very same sentiments many times to an extremely unreceptive group of responders both here & many other forums. Bob Harlan claims that performance was in no way the reason why he sought to seperate the two jobs (HC/GM) again, just that he thought the pressure of both jobs was too much for one person. Cap issues notwithstanding, Mike Sherman won 32 games in the 3 years he held down the HC/GM position for GB. Does that imply that TT has failed in the 3 years that he's held the GM position since Sherman departed? 27-21 is respectable but still falls 5 wins short of his predecessor, who was also doing MM's job from '02-'04. Given Coach Sherman's performance (53-27) prior to TT's arrival, I find it hard to comprehend why TT canned him after one lousy season (4-12, '05), which may or may not have been a ploy to undermine the 2nd winningest coach in team history. TT is being given more latitude than his predecessor got even though the results don't compare favorably to his predecessor's. Is mediocrity becoming tolerable in Titletown?</blockquote>

Total: 921 (members: 1, guests: 920)