Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wide Receiver Options
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 978233" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>While I actually do somewhat agree with you in a tunnel that a HOF QB needs OTA to improve his play, there’s also a separate reason that Matt wanted him there. There’s also a reason this was a substantial topic of debate. This wasn’t about his ability as much as it was about his commitment to getting these young guys acclimated with every tool possible. Not to mention his Employer had just fully invested a league high contract on him and proposed to give him say on draft targets. If that’s not commitment idk what is.</p><p></p><p>While a Jockey in a horse race weighing 5 pounds more this race similarly can’t be Quantified (it sounds trivial) it leaves question if that 5 LBs contributed to their last place finish when they normally finish first. It has to be addressed as one key component and Eliminated. Otherwise it looks like that Rider isn’t fully committed.</p><p></p><p>Sports is all about momentum and every possible edge you can get should not be trivialized. You could’ve just eliminated that variable. If, as you say, OTA’s are not important and have zero impact because they are voluntary, then why do many veterans attend them and why did Matt LaFleur say he wanted him there? When asked, why didn’t MLF just say they are not helpful? He looked like a deer in headlights because he had to cover for him that’s why.</p><p></p><p>Also had #12 made those meetings and texted that group? I’m 90% certain those other WR would’ve showed up in support. Other than Cobb, this 2022 group were NOT long time vested Veterans at the peak of their careers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 978233, member: 10086"] While I actually do somewhat agree with you in a tunnel that a HOF QB needs OTA to improve his play, there’s also a separate reason that Matt wanted him there. There’s also a reason this was a substantial topic of debate. This wasn’t about his ability as much as it was about his commitment to getting these young guys acclimated with every tool possible. Not to mention his Employer had just fully invested a league high contract on him and proposed to give him say on draft targets. If that’s not commitment idk what is. While a Jockey in a horse race weighing 5 pounds more this race similarly can’t be Quantified (it sounds trivial) it leaves question if that 5 LBs contributed to their last place finish when they normally finish first. It has to be addressed as one key component and Eliminated. Otherwise it looks like that Rider isn’t fully committed. Sports is all about momentum and every possible edge you can get should not be trivialized. You could’ve just eliminated that variable. If, as you say, OTA’s are not important and have zero impact because they are voluntary, then why do many veterans attend them and why did Matt LaFleur say he wanted him there? When asked, why didn’t MLF just say they are not helpful? He looked like a deer in headlights because he had to cover for him that’s why. Also had #12 made those meetings and texted that group? I’m 90% certain those other WR would’ve showed up in support. Other than Cobb, this 2022 group were NOT long time vested Veterans at the peak of their careers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
SudsMcBucky
tynimiller
CarryTheG14
gopkrs
mradtke66
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
26 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:10 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:09 AM
Movies and Entertainment
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:48 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Cornelius Weems
Today at 9:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wide Receiver Options
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
