1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
  2. Big Announcement Coming for 2015 Football Season!!

    Be on the look out for a big Packer Forum announcement when the schedule is released. Full details coming soon...

What Responsibility Should the GM Take For Injuries?

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by El Guapo, Nov 15, 2013.

  1. rodell330

    rodell330 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    2,928
    Ratings:
    +992
    Ozzie Newsome..Bill Belichick...now you can stop waiting.
     
  2. NY06

    NY06 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2012
    Messages:
    100
    Ratings:
    +25
    You know I have to add Jerry Reese ;)
    2 Super Bowl trophies on his résumé.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. melvin dangerr

    melvin dangerr Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2012
    Messages:
    407
    Ratings:
    +105
    Ok, just suppose you are the owner of a struggling company and you hire CEO's to run it and turn it around with only the assets you have been given, and you the CEO, knows if you fail to turn it around, 2 things happen, 1) the stock holders blame the owner 2)the CEO will get the major share of the blame because he was hired to turn the company around, knowing full well he could lose some key assets a long the way..it is Capers not TT, who has failed to turn things around…..please note I am not a big TT fan….
     
  4. Sunshinepacker

    Sunshinepacker Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,025
    Ratings:
    +356
    Your analogy doesn't hold up. Say the company aquired some key employee, say some Google employee that had developed some awesome new technology with the expectation that this technology would drive growth going forward. But then the patent office declared that Google owned the intellectual rights to the technology and therefore the firm couldn't use the tech they hired the employee for. The CEO (TT) would be blamed for betting on a guy that couldn't do what he had been hired for, not the project manager that suddenly had no project.
     

Share This Page