Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Viking stud n dud
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raptorman" data-source="post: 696359" data-attributes="member: 655"><p>Sorry if the truth hurts. I have never made any predictions about my team that weren't true. Nor will I make any about the Packers that are not true. Fact is, the Vikings offensive line sucks. The fact that they put up 475 yards against you defense should worry you. They are 30th in the league in offensive yards so far this year. The deference in this game was two turnovers by...................the Vikings offensive line. And if you think that strip sack of Bradford was all Clay Matthews, you should check on the rating of the Vikings left tackle. He is rated as the worst in the league, and is responsible for probably 80% of Bradford's turnovers.</p><p></p><p>If the Packer's want to go far in the playoffs, assuming they make it, their defense is going to have to get better and get better fast. </p><p></p><p>And for your information the title of the thread is "Studs and Duds". If you think the Packers Defense was a stud during the game tell me how. BTW, the Packers offense, that stud offense, had 63 yards of offensive production in the second half. They did all their damage in the first half. Maybe you should worry about that as well. </p><p></p><p>My team, they were done weeks ago. I know the weakness's of my team.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raptorman, post: 696359, member: 655"] Sorry if the truth hurts. I have never made any predictions about my team that weren't true. Nor will I make any about the Packers that are not true. Fact is, the Vikings offensive line sucks. The fact that they put up 475 yards against you defense should worry you. They are 30th in the league in offensive yards so far this year. The deference in this game was two turnovers by...................the Vikings offensive line. And if you think that strip sack of Bradford was all Clay Matthews, you should check on the rating of the Vikings left tackle. He is rated as the worst in the league, and is responsible for probably 80% of Bradford's turnovers. If the Packer's want to go far in the playoffs, assuming they make it, their defense is going to have to get better and get better fast. And for your information the title of the thread is "Studs and Duds". If you think the Packers Defense was a stud during the game tell me how. BTW, the Packers offense, that stud offense, had 63 yards of offensive production in the second half. They did all their damage in the first half. Maybe you should worry about that as well. My team, they were done weeks ago. I know the weakness's of my team. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Fat Dogs
Latest posts
Bucks 2024-25 Season Thread
Latest: Voyageur
5 minutes ago
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Pick 124 Barryn Sorrell Edge Texas
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:22 PM
Draft Talk
Isaiah Simmons is COMING
Latest: Sanguine camper
Today at 8:09 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Free Agency
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 6:54 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pick 198 Warren Brinson DT Georgia
Latest: Curly Calhoun
Today at 6:03 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Viking stud n dud
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top