Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Trade Theory
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 966873" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>My apologies I can see where we went wrong.</p><p> Resources is a hang up because it might’ve looked like I was disrespecting those players performance (the eventual outcome of the players stats etc) Which I didn’t intend it that way at all. I think those guys are great players. </p><p></p><p>I meant the FULL array of resources by its definition. Total Assets involved. The collateral in money and draft resources to get those players to begin with. Draft picks/Capital etc. </p><p>I didn’t mean infer the outcome of the resources was bad, just that we didn’t focus enough at getting Rodgers Assets.</p><p></p><p>The fact those guys performed so well speaks to how good #12 is. Imagine those guys with Gared Goff etc.. does that make more sense?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 966873, member: 10086"] My apologies I can see where we went wrong. Resources is a hang up because it might’ve looked like I was disrespecting those players performance (the eventual outcome of the players stats etc) Which I didn’t intend it that way at all. I think those guys are great players. I meant the FULL array of resources by its definition. Total Assets involved. The collateral in money and draft resources to get those players to begin with. Draft picks/Capital etc. I didn’t mean infer the outcome of the resources was bad, just that we didn’t focus enough at getting Rodgers Assets. The fact those guys performed so well speaks to how good #12 is. Imagine those guys with Gared Goff etc.. does that make more sense? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
GreenBaySlacker
Firethorn1001
gatorpack
sschind
Fat Dogs
gopkrs
Latest posts
G
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
1 minute ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: DoURant
26 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: DoURant
35 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Poppa San
39 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
56 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Trade Theory
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top