Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 966873" data-attributes="member: 10086">My apologies I can see where we went wrong. Resources is a hang up because it might’ve looked like I was disrespecting those players performance (the eventual outcome of the players stats etc)  Which I didn’t intend it that way at all. I think those guys are great players. I meant the FULL array of resources by its definition. Total Assets involved. The collateral in money and draft resources to get those players to begin with.  Draft picks/Capital etc.  I didn’t mean infer the outcome of the resources was bad, just that we didn’t focus enough at getting Rodgers Assets.The fact those guys performed so well speaks to how good #12 is. Imagine those guys with Gared Goff etc.. does that make more sense?</blockquote>

Total: 899 (members: 1, guests: 898)