Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Tae Adams
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 914984" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>They might have, but if it's not in writing, well.....I guess it doesn't mean much. I am still guessing they tried to pacify Rodgers after the Love pick with something like "you know, if you aren't happy in a year or 2, we can talk about trading you to another team". Rodgers took that as a "promise".</p><p></p><p>The other aspect of this is his trade value. His trade value would be a lot higher if the Packers could trade him under his current contract terms. Technically, they can, but he will make it clear that he won't play. So all these draft picks people expect the Packers to get for him are going to be reduced when a team finds out how much it's going to cost to sign him to a new deal. His latest attitude doesn't help the Packers in negotiations either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pokerbrat2000, post: 914984, member: 7261"] They might have, but if it's not in writing, well.....I guess it doesn't mean much. I am still guessing they tried to pacify Rodgers after the Love pick with something like "you know, if you aren't happy in a year or 2, we can talk about trading you to another team". Rodgers took that as a "promise". The other aspect of this is his trade value. His trade value would be a lot higher if the Packers could trade him under his current contract terms. Technically, they can, but he will make it clear that he won't play. So all these draft picks people expect the Packers to get for him are going to be reduced when a team finds out how much it's going to cost to sign him to a new deal. His latest attitude doesn't help the Packers in negotiations either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
milani
Latest posts
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
11 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 4:49 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
F
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Firethorn1001
Yesterday at 1:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 11:53 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Tae Adams
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top