Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 914856" data-attributes="member: 10086">No. I am however in support of cutting ties with players that openly voice their displeasure with our team (on multiple occasions or in various capacities). Right now those players are Rodgers and Adams.No way do I pay anywhere near league tI a player not 100% committed. That’s just a financial nightmare ready to happen. Do you not remember Martellus Bennett and how that distraction cost us dearly? That wasn’t even a pinky finger, we’re talking about our Right hand (Rodgers) and left thumb (Davante) here. Amen. Rodgers is all over the map and he’s put our entire team in a compromising situation. Adams is going out of his way to show more loyalty to Rodgers than his own employer.What a specific few forget is that Aaron Rodgers does not employ Davante Adams. While I appreciate Davante is trying to support his QB, Tae is allowing his emotions to dictate his future. Having the Packers bid on retaining Adams is only going to aid a competitive offer for a new contract, the less teams are competing for Davante, the less favorable his contract terms.Im perplexed that these guys don’t have any meaningful representation and the disgruntled players just can’t refrain from making crucial public statements. Seems odd to me.</blockquote>

Total: 589 (members: 1, guests: 588)