Starks or Grant?

Emperor_Xyn

Cheesehead
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Messages
192
Reaction score
1
Next year who do you think should be our number 1?

It's been a while since i've seen Grant but what from I remember Starks is a little bit better and seems to pick up a yard or 2 more than Grant would of been able to... Plus Starks is a little bit faster.

Thoughts?
 

longtimefan

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
25,364
Reaction score
4,093
Location
Milwaukee
Different runners I think Grant can hit harder..

They will both compete for the job
 

PackisBack

Cheesehead
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
102
Reaction score
13
Grant had back to back 1,200 yard rushing seasons before the injury. Starks had 101 yards this season. He's been a breath of fresh air into our running game, but when Grant comes back it will be his job to lose; he's the proven runner of the 2.
 

brett2520

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Messages
192
Reaction score
32
Location
Orlando, FL
Starks has more upside in that he will have a healthy offseason. Also, he has not been through a training camp yet to learn everything like he should and do the drills. Grant though is more consistent and if healthy, i think he could be a terror after being out a year. I think if they are competing at week 1, give grant the starts and let starks learn the system better until grant's contract is up.
 

BigBayBlues

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
98
Reaction score
28
Location
Chicago, IL
Grant had back to back 1,200 yard rushing seasons before the injury. Starks had 101 yards this season. He's been a breath of fresh air into our running game, but when Grant comes back it will be his job to lose; he's the proven runner of the 2.

Agreed.

I'd say Grant based on what hes shown in the past. Obviously it all depends how he comes back form this injury. I for one am not too thrilled about Starks so far...and yes, I know he's young.
 

GO PACK GO

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
11
Reaction score
5
Location
SLO, CA
James really seems to avoid tackles better than Ryan, and can get a couple extra yards, but like what was said above I believe Ryan can hit harder. It'll be interesting to see next season how it works out.
 

ivo610

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
16,588
Reaction score
2,250
Location
Madison
have them split carries. Who would have thought we would be debating this 3 months ago?
 
OP
OP
Emperor_Xyn

Emperor_Xyn

Cheesehead
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Messages
192
Reaction score
1
Wow I looked up Starks stats and only 100 yards. Feels like he should have around 200... lol. Yeah idk, had a change in heart Starks is still young but deffiently think we will see split carries between them. I like Starks on first down running.
 

7thFloorRA

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
2,573
Reaction score
331
Location
Grafton, WI
I would let Grant start and Starks relieve him. I think they will still have an even amount of carries until a hot hand is established.
 

longtimefan

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
25,364
Reaction score
4,093
Location
Milwaukee
Wow I looked up Starks stats and only 100 yards. Feels like he should have around 200... lol. Yeah idk, had a change in heart Starks is still young but deffiently think we will see split carries between them. I like Starks on first down running.


263 for playoffs
 

arrimike

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
76
Reaction score
12
Location
Springboro, OH
It is simple, Grant has proven himself over the years and Starks has shown us a little of what he COULD be. He hasn't played enough to show us that he is a consistent player like Grant. I don't think that Starks takes the #1 spot until we see a side effect of the Grant injury, or Starks shows us that great potential that we all see.
 

Powarun

Big Bay Blues fan
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
2,047
Reaction score
355
Location
Madison
ivo I was thinking we would have a Starks/Grant debate when I saw that the Packers got him as a running back. Though I figure the Nance/Grant/Starks argument would precede it.

Though my favorite scenario is: Bone Formation: Starks on the strong side of the line, Kuhn on the weak side, and Grant in the back. That would be the best of all worlds.
 

Eis Bowl

Touchdown Artist
Joined
Jun 14, 2010
Messages
134
Reaction score
18
Location
Quad Cities, USA
Start out with Grant at least. He's proven. Let Grant pound the D and then Starks can come in and run around a tied, bruised up D.
 

JBlood

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
3,159
Reaction score
467
It will be Grant's job to lose, but I think Starks is quicker to the hole, makes cuts that Grant doesn't, breaks tackles that Grant doesn't, and accelerates faster than Grant. If he stays healthy, he could be our primary running back. And if our offensive line learns to dominate the line of scrimmage every game, we should have quite a ball control offense.
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top