1. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

So, seriously...what's with the guys named Mike...?

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by rabidgopher04, Jan 12, 2006.

  1. rabidgopher04

    rabidgopher04 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,467
    Ratings:
    +0
    Why is there a Mike fetish with the Packers over the last 15 years?
     
  2. TOPackerFan

    TOPackerFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,084
    Ratings:
    +0
    Because guys named Ray are terrible?
     
  3. PWT36

    PWT36 Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Messages:
    895
    Ratings:
    +0
    It has worked fine. The Packer's record was 13 non losing seasons and the best record of any franchise from 1993 to 2004. Packers were in 20 playoff games --Winning 11 losing 9, two Super Bowl games winning one. The first Super Bowl win since 1967. The Packer' s record from 1992 until 2004, was wins 147 losses 81 under three Packer head Coaches. In years from 1968-1991 the Packer record as a miserable 147-201-9--two playoff games winning 1 and losing two under five Head coaches who all had losing records. Hopefully Mike McCarthy can be as successful as those two other Mikes or even better. Give this new coach a chance. That will be almost impossible for some of these negative poster to do, but that is the fair thing for a good Packer fan to do.
     
  4. PackFanatic

    PackFanatic Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    183
    Ratings:
    +13
    ANOTHER MIKE sheesh and i sure hope Bates STAYS here i think TT has a hole in his brain
     
  5. PackerChick

    PackerChick Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,143
    Ratings:
    +1
    Pretty much agreed here 36, give this guy a fair chance.
     
  6. P@ck66

    P@ck66 Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,207
    Ratings:
    +0
    PWT..

    The reason the Pack has been winning wasn't because of a guy called "Mike"....

    it was because of a dude named "Brett"...!

    (you'll see...)
     
  7. TOPackerFan

    TOPackerFan Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,084
    Ratings:
    +0
    Not even your hero Mike Holmgren? Wow!
     
  8. P@ck66

    P@ck66 Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,207
    Ratings:
    +0
    No..Holmgren was a winner...

    But..I think he was a winner because of Brett...(would have had a harder time with a guy named Matt...or Aaron..for instance..)
     
  9. vixtalkn

    vixtalkn Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    197
    Ratings:
    +0
    [​IMG]
    Mike McCarthy

    You're right. For some odd reason that's a lot of Mikes. Should have had a Lovie in their somewhere. :lol:
     
  10. bavpb

    bavpb Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Messages:
    599
    Ratings:
    +0
    "Okay Mike, for the last time; THIS IS A DEFENSE PLAYBOOK, DEFENSE!!!! :roll:"
    ......"Mhm :-? "

    [​IMG]
     
  11. DePack

    DePack Cheesehead

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    3,904
    Ratings:
    +1
    Could be worse.......it could be Wade!
     

Share This Page