Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers miffed about loss of Van Pelt
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackAttack12" data-source="post: 761443" data-attributes="member: 11933"><p>well having a better defense to take some pressure off of Hundley would have helped. Having better skill position players would have helped. It became abundantly clear that Adams is the only true offensive difference maker that we have. Williams and Jones are interesting young backs, but not game changers by any stretch of the imagination. </p><p></p><p>You want to focus solely on Hundley being bad. That's fine. He is bad. But two questions: would better talent/better defense gave made a difference in the teams results with Hundley? And whose damn fault is it that we have a 3rd year backup that sucks?! Does anyone get to be held accountable for that? </p><p></p><p>Hundley being bad is one example of many with the way this team is constructed/ran that is flawed. Hopefully the packers have made changes that will result in more wins, but for the past several years it's been Aaron Rodgers or bust. And somehow, other teams have figured out how to manage their teams while their starting QB is injured. </p><p></p><p>But of course, the Green Bay Packers are the only team that has to deal with injuries.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackAttack12, post: 761443, member: 11933"] well having a better defense to take some pressure off of Hundley would have helped. Having better skill position players would have helped. It became abundantly clear that Adams is the only true offensive difference maker that we have. Williams and Jones are interesting young backs, but not game changers by any stretch of the imagination. You want to focus solely on Hundley being bad. That's fine. He is bad. But two questions: would better talent/better defense gave made a difference in the teams results with Hundley? And whose damn fault is it that we have a 3rd year backup that sucks?! Does anyone get to be held accountable for that? Hundley being bad is one example of many with the way this team is constructed/ran that is flawed. Hopefully the packers have made changes that will result in more wins, but for the past several years it's been Aaron Rodgers or bust. And somehow, other teams have figured out how to manage their teams while their starting QB is injured. But of course, the Green Bay Packers are the only team that has to deal with injuries. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
G
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Yesterday at 11:17 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 10:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Curly Calhoun
Yesterday at 5:37 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 4:33 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Interesting Facebook Page
Latest: El Guapo
Yesterday at 3:06 PM
Forum Feedback & Suggestions
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers miffed about loss of Van Pelt
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top