Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers miffed about loss of Van Pelt
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 761331" data-attributes="member: 9033"><p>Yes, Rodgers is absolutely more important to this team than MM. To suggest otherwise is just silly. We just got to see what this team was like without Rodgers and it was, to say the least, unimpressive. I might, <em>might</em>, be inclined to say that Belichick is as important as a great QB but Belichick is both the GM and one of the greatest coaches in NFL history. MM is neither of those things.</p><p></p><p>Also, at what point did I say that Rodgers needed to be the coach, staff, etc.? I simply said that keeping him in the loop and communicating would be a good idea. I really don't understand the idea that discussing things with the best player in the NFL is somehow a ridiculous thing to do. As I said, you're not giving Rodgers the ability to veto any decisions, you're just talking with him and keeping him up to date on things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sunshinepacker, post: 761331, member: 9033"] Yes, Rodgers is absolutely more important to this team than MM. To suggest otherwise is just silly. We just got to see what this team was like without Rodgers and it was, to say the least, unimpressive. I might, [I]might[/I], be inclined to say that Belichick is as important as a great QB but Belichick is both the GM and one of the greatest coaches in NFL history. MM is neither of those things. Also, at what point did I say that Rodgers needed to be the coach, staff, etc.? I simply said that keeping him in the loop and communicating would be a good idea. I really don't understand the idea that discussing things with the best player in the NFL is somehow a ridiculous thing to do. As I said, you're not giving Rodgers the ability to veto any decisions, you're just talking with him and keeping him up to date on things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Arodgers12
Pkrjones
Latest posts
R
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: rmontro
50 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: milani
Today at 6:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024
Latest: milani
Today at 6:54 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Official Schedule For 2024
Latest: DoURant
Today at 1:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers to Play in Brazil
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 11:09 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers miffed about loss of Van Pelt
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top