Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Un4GivN" data-source="post: 644540" data-attributes="member: 8782">My point is though, if you go back and watch the 2010 season... His receivers didn't have huge separation either. Just Rodgers was playing at an all-time great level. His passes were so precise I have never seen anything like it before. Fitting in windows that were inches bigger than the football. He never missed someone like he did JJ on the deep ball last weekend. I mean he missed that by yards, not inches. He missed at least 3 open receivers on 3rd down, only to throw to a guy whom was covered like glue. Don't get me wrong I understand **** happens, and you miss things. But you can't be this consistently off and put the blame everywhere else.His receivers aren't getting that much less separation now, just Rodgers isn't fitting it in there. This isn't to say "Rodgers is to blame", it's a team game. But I'll tell you this... If Rodgers was playing now like he did in the run 2010, the Packers would have a good chance. Even if no one else improved at all. But like the rest of the offense he is under-performing.So in closing, he's is not "the reason" but is certainly deserves a portion for the recent struggles... Maybe it's unfair to hold him to that standard?</blockquote>

Total: 102 (members: 6, guests: 96)