Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pro Football Focus ranks Packers O-Line #7 overall in final rankings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 813067" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>lets Face it. It takes time for any QB to get in sync with receivers. When Geronimo went down we then had just 2 Wideouts who had played more than a few hours of live regular game experience with this team </p><p> Cobb’s snap count was a fraction of Adams. He essentially missed half the season.</p><p> </p><p>I would like to see where GB compares with other teams in continuity.</p><p></p><p>1. Id like to see the breakdown by % of passing plays directed at a particular position group. RB, TE, WR (heck throw in a category for misc eligible players) A pie chart if you will.</p><p></p><p>2. Then how many total snaps did each QB have with WR veterans of at least 1 full season accrued in each Offensive system.</p><p></p><p>3. Then I’d like to see how many total snaps did each QB have with TE veterans of at least 1 accrued season with said team.</p><p></p><p>4. Then I’d like to see how many total snaps did each QB have with RB veterans of at least 1 accrued season with said team.</p><p></p><p>This is truly just a hunch, but from a generality of looking around the league I don’t see a bulk of teams</p><p>having the inexperience in a system. I have a feeling from a weighted % of snaps per position grouping into that total pie that the GB Offense is either at or near the bottom of the league in experience playing together. The main ingredient of continuity</p><p></p><p>I say 1 year accrued AND veteran because it’s rare that receivers are high impact players their first year in a system or their first year in the league. While there are exceptions,, they are generally prominent athletes who are at the top of their game or top of the draft board.</p><p></p><p>I think we should eliminate the newness factor before we make accusations about our O line or QB. They are the least likely to be the most weighted factor when considering Bulaga, Taylor, Linsley, Bak, McCray all played significant snaps this year. If we’re questioning sack count, throw away count etc.. it makes sense to go about it the logical way.</p><p></p><p>You don’t investigate a crime scene spending all your resources on the outside perimeter of available persons of interest. You go to the high probability candidate when times a tickin’</p><p> Aaron Rodgers isn’t a 2nd year player and this O line isn’t a rookie grouping. They have an automatic alibi with character witnessss galore and a rock solid resume.</p><p>Assuming the thread information is valid and accurate. The #7 OL ranking helps us take focus off them because it’s essentially similar to an alibi. It’s now either the QB or the Receivers. The next logical question is...</p><p></p><p></p><p>Who’s the new guy(s)??</p><p></p><p>P.S. I take back everything bad I’ve been saying about Bulaga behind his back <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/whistling.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":whistling:" title="Whistling :whistling:" data-shortname=":whistling:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 813067, member: 10086"] lets Face it. It takes time for any QB to get in sync with receivers. When Geronimo went down we then had just 2 Wideouts who had played more than a few hours of live regular game experience with this team Cobb’s snap count was a fraction of Adams. He essentially missed half the season. I would like to see where GB compares with other teams in continuity. 1. Id like to see the breakdown by % of passing plays directed at a particular position group. RB, TE, WR (heck throw in a category for misc eligible players) A pie chart if you will. 2. Then how many total snaps did each QB have with WR veterans of at least 1 full season accrued in each Offensive system. 3. Then I’d like to see how many total snaps did each QB have with TE veterans of at least 1 accrued season with said team. 4. Then I’d like to see how many total snaps did each QB have with RB veterans of at least 1 accrued season with said team. This is truly just a hunch, but from a generality of looking around the league I don’t see a bulk of teams having the inexperience in a system. I have a feeling from a weighted % of snaps per position grouping into that total pie that the GB Offense is either at or near the bottom of the league in experience playing together. The main ingredient of continuity I say 1 year accrued AND veteran because it’s rare that receivers are high impact players their first year in a system or their first year in the league. While there are exceptions,, they are generally prominent athletes who are at the top of their game or top of the draft board. I think we should eliminate the newness factor before we make accusations about our O line or QB. They are the least likely to be the most weighted factor when considering Bulaga, Taylor, Linsley, Bak, McCray all played significant snaps this year. If we’re questioning sack count, throw away count etc.. it makes sense to go about it the logical way. You don’t investigate a crime scene spending all your resources on the outside perimeter of available persons of interest. You go to the high probability candidate when times a tickin’ Aaron Rodgers isn’t a 2nd year player and this O line isn’t a rookie grouping. They have an automatic alibi with character witnessss galore and a rock solid resume. Assuming the thread information is valid and accurate. The #7 OL ranking helps us take focus off them because it’s essentially similar to an alibi. It’s now either the QB or the Receivers. The next logical question is... Who’s the new guy(s)?? P.S. I take back everything bad I’ve been saying about Bulaga behind his back :whistling: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
monte smith
mradtke66
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 12:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 11:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Off Season News
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 2:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pro Football Focus ranks Packers O-Line #7 overall in final rankings
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
