Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Half Empty" data-source="post: 1065626" data-attributes="member: 10288">The guarantee question turned out to be pretty interesting.  For one thing, in preparing to reply, I see that Thirteen agreed with Amish that guarantees are not good and then loved Sunshine's contention that they are good.  Could use some clarification on that.If there wasn't a cap, I'd be fine with throwing as much money at players as they want, with the multi-billionaires not missing it, even though many players don't deserve what they're not good enough to earn.  Of course, the one 'owner' that would get crushed under that circumstance is the Packers.  And, with the cap, I'm against guarantees because paying for players who don't measure up prevent the team from paying those others that do.</blockquote>

Total: 235 (members: 1, guests: 234)