Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sschind" data-source="post: 669382" data-attributes="member: 10247">I could agree with that assessment although the Cardinals would have to be in consideration as well even though Fitz is getting a bit old.  They would probably be my pick for third if you are just ranking the top 2 but I think their backups are just a tad more proven which IMO gives their overall group a higher rating.  The way I see it is when you have a great #1 and #2 WR it is difficult to justify that top pick on a WR and to give any rookies you do draft the opportunities to be a game changer early in their careers.  Think of the top rookie WRs over the last few years and they were pretty much their team's go to guys or at least their #2 option right from the start.  I realize they have not all been #1 picks but they were still counted on early.  Its hard for a #3 guy to put up the numbers to get noticed.  The Packers are drafting WRs with the hopes that they be solid contributors early on in their careers and not game changers.  Not that they would mind a game changer obviously but with one of the best 1-2 guys its not such a big deal.</blockquote>

Total: 700 (members: 2, guests: 698)