Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1081623" data-attributes="member: 10086">It’s an interesting question. I listened to a discussion on that topic and can’t recall who it was? So I apologize you’ll have to take my word for it.  Anyway their take was not positive on the subject.  They thought that Chicago was reliant on winning games “because” of a singular component of the Defense. However. That component being turnovers can be highly susceptible to a flip switching. Suddenly you have a pair of games where you don’t go +1 or +2 and you hit an even 0 or -1 or -2. The entire dynamic changes was their contention.It’s not negative itself to create turnovers or have ball security. Yet it’s the worst trait to rely on across the top 4-5 categories on Defense because it’s the hardest to retain control.Amen. Coming off losing our TE1 in many seasons would hurt. However Tucker has become the focal point for MLF. It’s really hard to just pluck a guy like Tucker (or Anon Ra) and nit miss a beat that game or next game. I think his presence missing was going to affect the Offense for a couple of games. Thankfully GB doesn’t have a clear #1 and then nobody’s. We’ve gotta a bunch of #2’s and #3’s types to pick up slack.</blockquote>

Total: 984 (members: 1, guests: 983)