Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers trade Damarious Randall to Browns
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="swhitset" data-source="post: 775941" data-attributes="member: 11289"><p>But that doesn't fit the ridiculous narrative that that ....person... is trying to spin. The Packers are a winning organization and yes it certainly helps to have a top QB, however, it appears that because they are a winning organization they are willing to make changes as well. It appears that they recognized that some changes were in order after last season so what did they do? They went out and changed the organizational structure .... changed GMs, kept what they thought was working well, and appear to be changing what wasn't. They have definitely been more active in free agency... The offense is said to be getting a makeover. The defense had a glaring weakness at CB... so they drafted two top corners as well as bringing in some low cost help in free agency. Salary cap had become tight ...so they made the tough choice and released an aging veteran that unfortunately was due to make more than his projected ability. I could go on but... Not all of these choices are guaranteed to be the right ones, and many here may disagree with some or all of them, but none of them are the mark of a perennial loser.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="swhitset, post: 775941, member: 11289"] But that doesn't fit the ridiculous narrative that that ....person... is trying to spin. The Packers are a winning organization and yes it certainly helps to have a top QB, however, it appears that because they are a winning organization they are willing to make changes as well. It appears that they recognized that some changes were in order after last season so what did they do? They went out and changed the organizational structure .... changed GMs, kept what they thought was working well, and appear to be changing what wasn't. They have definitely been more active in free agency... The offense is said to be getting a makeover. The defense had a glaring weakness at CB... so they drafted two top corners as well as bringing in some low cost help in free agency. Salary cap had become tight ...so they made the tough choice and released an aging veteran that unfortunately was due to make more than his projected ability. I could go on but... Not all of these choices are guaranteed to be the right ones, and many here may disagree with some or all of them, but none of them are the mark of a perennial loser. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Pkrjones
Don Barclay
Latest posts
S
Kraft or Musgrave
Latest: Sunshinepacker
Today at 3:37 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Post-Draft 53 Projection
Latest: Schultz
Today at 3:00 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 8:57 AM
College Sports
2024 Round 5, pick 163 Jacob Monk, OL
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 7:44 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:08 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers trade Damarious Randall to Browns
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top