Packers trade Damarious Randall to Browns

[Deleted member 6794]

More details to follow.

 

[Reggie White Cheese]

What did they get??? This leads me to think Richard Sherman might be coming

 

[Alex]

What did they get??? This leads me to think Richard Sherman might be coming

Would be nice to actually get him before giving away CB's. What if he decides he wants to go elsewhere? Then we're stuck with developing another pick...

 

[FaninColorado]

Well I guess that might change the draft boards for us... Possibly only adding one or two offensive players because we have needs on the Edge/DL, OLB, possibly #2 ILB, and now CB. Unless we are REALLY ACTIVE in free agency, the path might be defensive so Pettine can get players that fit his style.

 

[Jerellh528]

Interesting, wonder what we’re getting back

 

[Deleted member 6794]

Well I guess that might change the draft boards for us... Possibly only adding one or two offensive players because we have needs on the Edge/DL, OLB, possibly #2 ILB, and now CB. Unless we are REALLY ACTIVE in free agency, the path might be defensive so Pettine can get players that fit his style.

The Packers were in need of an upgrade at cornerback even before trading Randall. The move results in the team being more desperate in improving the position though.

 

[ThePerfectBeard]

So, this is pretty surprising. I'd like to know what we got and hope we are going to grab someone in free agency. We're super thin right now.

 

[FaninColorado]

Buffalo will be trading up to get one of the top QB's... just depends on how high they go.

Packers 14 for Bills 21 and Bills 53 could be coming our way... Or maybe even going after both of their 1st's for our first, 3rd and 4th.

 

[Snoops]

For what tho like a 5th rounder like wtf they better sign either Sherman Johnson or butler

 

[FaninColorado]

Would be nice to know what we got Randall... if we get a 2nd for him... trading up on our side is very good possibility as well with #14, #33 or #35, #45... we could move up to #6 or #7

 

[Deleted member 6794]

The Packers have acquired QB DeShone Kizer for Randall. At the moment it's unclear if picks are involved as well.

 

[easyk83]

The Packers have acquired QB DeShone Kizer for Randall. At the moment it's unclear if picks are involved as well.

If we only got Kizer I will be wondering over Gute's competence.

 

[ThePerfectBeard]

For Kizer?!!! WTF???

 

[Jerellh528]

The Packers have acquired QB DeShone Kizer for Randall. At the moment it's unclear if picks are involved as well.

Wow that’s weird. I’m trusting gute at the moment but I’m curious as to what he’s got up his sleeve

 

[easyk83]

I mean we already have Brett Hundley why do you want a second scatterarmed mistake prone quarterback.

 

[Snoops]

For Kizer?!!! WTF???

That’s exactly what I thought! Maybe last year in the draft they were serious about taking him... I mean hundley beat Kizer... I’m confused lol

 

[Jerellh528]

The Packers have acquired QB DeShone Kizer for Randall. At the moment it's unclear if picks are involved as well.

We also swapped picks with them in the 4th and 5th rounds

 

[ThePerfectBeard]

Wow that’s weird. I’m trusting gute at the moment but I’m curious as to what he’s got up his sleeve

I'm hoping it's something good. Kizer looked awful and like Hundley the 2nd.

 

[easyk83]

Maybe Gute was just blown away by Kizer's performance against a defense belonging to the legendary Dom Capers.

 

[adambr2]

This is a terrible deal if straight up. Our best corner for a guy to compete with Hundley for the backup QB spot?

 

[bigbubbatd]

Swap of 4th and 5th round picks too

 

[easyk83]

We also swapped picks with them in the 4th and 5th rounds

Is that it?

 

[Snoops]

Wow that’s weird. I’m trusting gute at the moment but I’m curious as to what he’s got up his sleeve

I don’t wanna EVER have to experience him starting for us I don’t wanna see nothing up his sleeve his arms crossed on the sidelines watching Rodgers is all I care about and no he is not gonna replace Rodgers nobody start that

 

[Deleted member 6794]

I don't understand the reasoning behind trading a starter at a position of need for a quarterback who hopefully won't play any meaningful snaps either.

 

[bigbubbatd]

Is that it?

Sounds like it