Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HardRightEdge" data-source="post: 678572">You get only 46 on game day.  The 53rd. guy isn't likely to suit up anyway.  If there are sufficient injuries at a particular position group, then expect a name to be added.  And that may be what they're waiting for...addressing the first acute need that pops up.  So far, as the NFL goes, the team is pretty healthy. I don't think we've gotten an answer yet as to how the Packers didn't forfeit PS eligibility for Bradford by not carrying 53, but evidently they did.Edit:  The Captain threw out the Bradford red herring and we all followed along.  He spent all of 2014 on the 53 man roster.  This is only his second practice squad year.  So, the Packers were comfortable forfeiting 3rd. year PS eligibility because, quite simply, there are no players on the PS who would be affected.</blockquote>

Total: 284 (members: 4, guests: 280)