Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pack should have been in the position of the Eagles with QBs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DILLIGAFF" data-source="post: 277677" data-attributes="member: 1719"><p>I guess thats my point, "if" Brohm had worked out we could have traded Brohm and still kept Flynn or vise versa, gotten and extra pick. Had Brohm showed any promise and development (combined with his college career)while in Green Bay, I am pretty sure we could have gotten a first round pick from somebody. QB position commands a higher price than any other position.</p><p> </p><p>I guess when we made that pick I really thought that was a great move, but did not work, could not even win the backup role.</p><p> </p><p>Just think how much attention the Eagles are getting, If Brohm had worked out the Pack would have 2 (young) starting QBs with a very able backup with Flynn who could be a possible starter. This would be far better situation than the what the Eagles are in.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DILLIGAFF, post: 277677, member: 1719"] I guess thats my point, "if" Brohm had worked out we could have traded Brohm and still kept Flynn or vise versa, gotten and extra pick. Had Brohm showed any promise and development (combined with his college career)while in Green Bay, I am pretty sure we could have gotten a first round pick from somebody. QB position commands a higher price than any other position. I guess when we made that pick I really thought that was a great move, but did not work, could not even win the backup role. Just think how much attention the Eagles are getting, If Brohm had worked out the Pack would have 2 (young) starting QBs with a very able backup with Flynn who could be a possible starter. This would be far better situation than the what the Eagles are in. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
scheeler
ExpatPacker
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: OldSchool101
34 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:28 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: Sanguine camper
Today at 3:00 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 1:57 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pack should have been in the position of the Eagles with QBs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top