Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 844151" data-attributes="member: 10086">I think there should’ve been better and more frequent designed plays to compensate for an aggressive pass rush. An antidote so to speak. We failed him last year by all but ignoring the TEs and RBs in the short passing game. Lo and behold we get a HC who supports this theory (no accident) It’s no secret, the only way you beat Rodgers is by putting him on his back and pressuring him repeatedly and getting him off his game.While it’s true that Aaron sometimes holds the ball too long, conversely, he makes chicken salad out of chicken poop on many others. This doesn’t even account for his historically ultra-low turnover ratio. Do you want him to throw more at the cost of a 2-1 or 3-2 INT rate? That’s something you can’t put a price tag on. I’ll take 4 sacks vs 2 if it keeps him at a 14-1 TD-INT.We can control what we can control... the plays getting out quicker by giving more short range options.</blockquote>

Total: 898 (members: 2, guests: 896)