Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Official Seattle thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sea_Hawker" data-source="post: 592670" data-attributes="member: 10552"><p>I'm going to respectfully disagree on parts of this. Seattle doesn't give you a lot of different looks on defense. With the news of Maxwell being able to go, there won't be a lot of shifting going on. Maxwell and Sherman on the corners is a pretty tough match up for any receiver. That's not to say there aren't yards to be had but they aren't going to be easy to get. And if you do, Chancellor will likely make you pay for it. I do agree that contain on the edges is going to be critical for the Pack O line so I think that is a see how it plays out during the game. </p><p></p><p>Mobile QB's tend to give our O line more difficulty, hence why Carolina had some success against us. That's part of the reason I'm dwelling on the health of AR so much. If you take that away, leave the LOB out there to patrol the middle and edges, that puts an awful lot on Lacy to have a lot of success on the 3rd ranked rush defense and AR to have a lot of success against the number 1 pass defense in the game. Factor in that it's in a building that is pretty impossible to communicate in and it's just my opinion that is a tall order. Again, if there is any offense I think could do it, it's GB but it's in no way going to be as simple as numbers. </p><p></p><p>On defense for the Packers, I think you're missing a few things. TE Luke Willson would be the first. He has been on fire the last several weeks. If you 'play them like everyone plays them', RW is going to burn you either with his legs or his arm. Kearse and Baldwin have the ability to make those catches. It's not really something our offense does a lot, so you don't see it a lot but when they do have the chance to make those plays, more often than not they do. If you correct for that, there's the little matter of Marshawn Lynch.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sea_Hawker, post: 592670, member: 10552"] I'm going to respectfully disagree on parts of this. Seattle doesn't give you a lot of different looks on defense. With the news of Maxwell being able to go, there won't be a lot of shifting going on. Maxwell and Sherman on the corners is a pretty tough match up for any receiver. That's not to say there aren't yards to be had but they aren't going to be easy to get. And if you do, Chancellor will likely make you pay for it. I do agree that contain on the edges is going to be critical for the Pack O line so I think that is a see how it plays out during the game. Mobile QB's tend to give our O line more difficulty, hence why Carolina had some success against us. That's part of the reason I'm dwelling on the health of AR so much. If you take that away, leave the LOB out there to patrol the middle and edges, that puts an awful lot on Lacy to have a lot of success on the 3rd ranked rush defense and AR to have a lot of success against the number 1 pass defense in the game. Factor in that it's in a building that is pretty impossible to communicate in and it's just my opinion that is a tall order. Again, if there is any offense I think could do it, it's GB but it's in no way going to be as simple as numbers. On defense for the Packers, I think you're missing a few things. TE Luke Willson would be the first. He has been on fire the last several weeks. If you 'play them like everyone plays them', RW is going to burn you either with his legs or his arm. Kearse and Baldwin have the ability to make those catches. It's not really something our offense does a lot, so you don't see it a lot but when they do have the chance to make those plays, more often than not they do. If you correct for that, there's the little matter of Marshawn Lynch. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
58 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 10:55 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Yesterday at 10:05 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Official Seattle thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top