Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 910594" data-attributes="member: 7261">That is kind of my point and why I asked the question. Revenue sharing happens and is equal for all teams, no matter how many people they put in the stands.  If Rodgers was on a team that couldn't sell tickets, I think their is an argument to be made that he sells tickets.  However, selling tickets has never been an issue in Green Bay. So maybe he brings in some revenue during road games, where more tickets are sold to see Packers #12. Jerseys?  Well those profits are also shared.  So my question still is the same....how much additional money was made and approximately how much less the team would have made had they not drafted Aaron Rodgers or if Aaron Rodgers never existed.One might try to make an argument that the team lost money on Rodgers, since they paid him a hell of a lot more than some teams have to pay a QB.I'm not using this as some sort of "Aaron Rodgers was a waste of money".  I am just curious as to why people keep saying "He has made the team a ton of money."</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 635 (members: 0, guests: 635)