New Mock - Traded with the Jets

[Big L]

Jets came a calling so I traded 28 for 35 - 69 - 111

1 - 22 Burks WR Arkansas
2 - 35 Jones DL Connecticut - from Jets
2 - 53 Enagbare Edge S. Carolina
2 - 59 McBride TE Colorado St
3 - 69 Pierce WR Cincy - from Jets
3 - 92 Cross S Maryland
4 - 111 Tom OL Wake Forest from Jets
4 - 132 Smith Edge Ohio St
4 - 140 Jackson LB App. St
5 - 171 Araiza P San Diego St
7 - 228 Wright Edge UAB
7 - 249 Empey C/G BYU
7 - 258 Brooks RB Oklahoma

I requested they include the 111 and they did -

opinions ?

 

[tynimiller]

I’m betting that trade we’d have to include a late day three back minimum. Don’t dislike any prospect personally enough to qualm with.

I’m very mixed on taking a TE before Day 3 from a mixture of talent this year in the class and our roster presently. Wouldn’t hate it but also wonder where else we could be better served - however have to see how the draft fals

 

[Schultz]

The chart I use and I do like a trade with the Jets but it would cost 22 & 53 for 35-38 & 111.

 

[Poppa San]

The chart I use and I do like a trade with the Jets but it would cost 22 & 53 for 35-38 & 111.

But he got 69 instead of 38. I could see value with 35 & 69 for 28. Especially if you get 111 as a bonus.

 

[Big L]

I think

I’m betting that trade we’d have to include a late day three back minimum. Don’t dislike any prospect personally enough to qualm with.

I’m very mixed on taking a TE before Day 3 from a mixture of talent this year in the class and our roster presently. Wouldn’t hate it but also wonder where else we could be better served - however have to see how the draft fals

I was prepared to send a seven but they accepted.

I like the draft as a whole, and think I got some real players in the 3 - 4th rounders. I also love the Empey pick with the second 7th rounder

 

[Schultz]

But he got 69 instead of 38. I could see value with 35 & 69 for 28. Especially if you get 111 as a bonus.

My point is the Jets are not giving up what he got in a fantasy, mythical, hypothetical internet trade.

 

[OldSchool101]

But he got 69 instead of 38. I could see value with 35 & 69 for 28. Especially if you get 111 as a bonus.

Yeah but getting a 35, 69, 111 for trading back 8 spots from 28?
Id love it, but it ain’t happening.

Jets would get our 4th or 5th and keep their 111 also.

But I like the selections

 

[Big L]

Yeah but getting a 35, 69, 111 for trading back 8 spots from 28?
Id love it, but it ain’t happening.

Jets would get our 4th or 5th and keep their 111 also.

But I like the selections

Ok - could be a bit much, but first round selections are not thought of quite the same way as any other round, they just aren’t. I certainly don’t believe dropping down from 28 to 35 and acquiring 69 is far fetched. I just asked for 111 and they accepted.

For me it was more about the value I could get in those areas of the draft then it was about trying to be pin point equaling out the value charts

 

[Big L]

I also did one trading both first round picks. The values may or may not mesh, but it’s more about what you guys think of the selections I made in those spots for the Packers and if you think the selections were of good value based on the round, the number and who I already had selected.

 

[gopkrs]

I also did one trading both first round picks. The values may or may not mesh, but it’s more about what you guys think of the selections I made in those spots for the Packers and if you think the selections were of good value based on the round, the number and who I already had selected.

It's not about selections being "good value" imho. In your scenario it's about which way actually is going to help the team. Having a couple extra picks is not going to automatically do that. In fact, you'd have to get lucky.