Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 992339" data-attributes="member: 10086">That was after slightly overcompensating as the season progressed. Much due to people like myself asking WTH was going on and it eventually got to the top.Going into 2022, The Packers had  arguably one of the top 5 best RB tandems in the NFL. Everyone’s Brother and Sister knew that the Packers were thin at WR from a continuity standpoint, including yourself.  When a team has a “known” learning curve at a particular position (such as we did at WR in 2022) it’s just common sense to increase reliance on other phases through increased usage. Then slowly and methodically reverting back to normal.It doesn’t take a NASA scientist to assert that GB underutilized the RB group both overall AND especially in the first half of the season. Even Matt said so himself.25th should’ve been 5th in the first half of the season. 15th was a good try at recouping our rushing attempts back to somewhere respectable and guess what happened when we did what you claimed to be was unnecessary if you recall? We started winningToo little, Too late. Lack of early season RB usage was a top 5 reason for our miserable 18 points per game early in our season. I said it didn’t work then and I’ll say it again now.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 463 (members: 0, guests: 463)