Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 813112" data-attributes="member: 10086">I’m not sure it may have been mentioned. People are comparing him to Janis which misses the whole point I think? Janis was one dimensional and couldn’t play QB. I’d much rather have a guy that’s s #3 QB and can come in and finish a game if needed. But the bonus is he’s pretty good on ST. I watched several games where he was very good on ST coverage.  The gadget player was just a bonus and showed how universally talented he is.He didn’t need to compete with Janis he’s a designated QB they are not even competing for the same primary position  I’d much rather use a #53 slot on a 3rd string QB that can produce decent on ST and sprinkle in at Receiver. That’s such a rarity.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 946 (members: 0, guests: 946)