Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="musccy" data-source="post: 24695" data-attributes="member: 219">90% could predict the plays:Well you have a 50:50 chance of being right to begin w/...then if you put some thought into what they're likely to call on 3rd and 9, then I'd hope you'd predict the play.The reason I keep referencing the Henderson play is because that could happen on any play, but you don't know it.  Sherman could send 17 running backs into the flat, but if Brett doesn't throw it there, it won't be shown on TV.  You wouldn't know if it happened, but you'd undoubtedly blame MS for it.Brett isn't surrounded by talent?  He's surrounded by a lot more than Dilfer is, yet Dilfer outplayed Brett.  If Brett were THAT good, wouldn't he be able to overcome weaknesses in the team?I've probably mentioned to you 8 times in the last week that I acknowledge that MS has his faults, and that wrs (apparently) not getting open as much (although I've read Murphy was open a lot on sun) lies at least somewhat on the coaches shoulders.  But your argument is so bullheaded...you can not admit that Favre plays some roll in his ints...I am not the only person who sees his decline.  Listen to any talk show w/out a Packer bias and they will say the same stuff I'm saying.  Je's still better than whatever else the Pack has, and he's still swell and all, but he contributes a lot to the losing efforts...EVEN HE SAYS SO!!!!!!!!!!</blockquote>

Total: 1,054 (members: 1, guests: 1,053)