Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
How about a "traditional" 3-4?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 572981" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Actually. I agree and disagree. Sorry to be a pain sir.</p><p>Ok. You are semantically correct about the definition. Although I did say we can run a 3-4. 4-3. 7-0. Whatever you call it it still non aggressive against a running team You just made my argument for me on the run gap statement. We rarely hit people at LOS. Or as my dad sais "we play not to lose" And this has been the case in nearly every scheme you can think of under Capers. Call it 29 different formats we are still not aggressive in approach. As far as personnel. Listen, if you can hold off 100,000 warriors with 300 men I'm guessing those. 300 men are not super humans it's about strategy. I appreciate your opinion and respect that. But if your telling me Daniels Datone Boyd Peppers Matthews AJ etc. are not playing hard enough or talented enough I don't buy it as a whole. I blame application of that personnel. It's starts at the top. You cant win a Chsmpionship with 11 one on one battles. It a team effort</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 572981, member: 10086"] Actually. I agree and disagree. Sorry to be a pain sir. Ok. You are semantically correct about the definition. Although I did say we can run a 3-4. 4-3. 7-0. Whatever you call it it still non aggressive against a running team You just made my argument for me on the run gap statement. We rarely hit people at LOS. Or as my dad sais "we play not to lose" And this has been the case in nearly every scheme you can think of under Capers. Call it 29 different formats we are still not aggressive in approach. As far as personnel. Listen, if you can hold off 100,000 warriors with 300 men I'm guessing those. 300 men are not super humans it's about strategy. I appreciate your opinion and respect that. But if your telling me Daniels Datone Boyd Peppers Matthews AJ etc. are not playing hard enough or talented enough I don't buy it as a whole. I blame application of that personnel. It's starts at the top. You cant win a Chsmpionship with 11 one on one battles. It a team effort [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
PikeBadger
Moderator
Members online
DoURant
PackerDNA
DABIGZ
GBkrzygrl
PikeBadger
Half Empty
Team Ronny
Latest posts
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: DoURant
A moment ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
1 minute ago
Draft Talk
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: PikeBadger
8 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: Raleigh NC Packers Fan
21 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: DoURant
38 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
How about a "traditional" 3-4?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top