Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Free Agency Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1029807" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Gotta respectfully disagree. I wouldn’t call 63 catches unproductive for a FA jumping into a new system with a lesser QB (than #12) and lesser team overall.(4-12)</p><p>739 yards (12 yards per)</p><p>3 TD’s</p><p>31 1st Downs (scored a 1st down on 49% of his catches which matched his 1st down % in 2011)</p><p></p><p>Jordy had the #2 most receiving yards, just behind Jared Cook. Had he stayed with #12 I think it’s a reasonable deduction he puts up 800-1000 receiving yards 4-6 TD’s area. We also know from his interview that he would’ve accepted less than $6.4M guaranteed but never got an offer. At $5mil area that production is B+/A-</p><p>They thought he was holding back young talent, you can ask JJ he said it on an interview.</p><p>That talent?? Geronimo, Kumerow and EQ. He certainly was holding back Cobb or Adams, so it Turns out that was wrong also.</p><p>It’s ok to want to back our team but we do have the benefit of hindsight, because that was 6 years ago.</p><p>I won’t even get into the effect it had on #12 and ongoing turmoil we all witnessed.</p><p>Normally we are good on average and even better as of late on moving on from players in FA. I’d grade us B/B+ on a C+ scale.</p><p>On that one.. Bad decision D+ grade</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1029807, member: 10086"] Gotta respectfully disagree. I wouldn’t call 63 catches unproductive for a FA jumping into a new system with a lesser QB (than #12) and lesser team overall.(4-12) 739 yards (12 yards per) 3 TD’s 31 1st Downs (scored a 1st down on 49% of his catches which matched his 1st down % in 2011) Jordy had the #2 most receiving yards, just behind Jared Cook. Had he stayed with #12 I think it’s a reasonable deduction he puts up 800-1000 receiving yards 4-6 TD’s area. We also know from his interview that he would’ve accepted less than $6.4M guaranteed but never got an offer. At $5mil area that production is B+/A- They thought he was holding back young talent, you can ask JJ he said it on an interview. That talent?? Geronimo, Kumerow and EQ. He certainly was holding back Cobb or Adams, so it Turns out that was wrong also. It’s ok to want to back our team but we do have the benefit of hindsight, because that was 6 years ago. I won’t even get into the effect it had on #12 and ongoing turmoil we all witnessed. Normally we are good on average and even better as of late on moving on from players in FA. I’d grade us B/B+ on a C+ scale. On that one.. Bad decision D+ grade [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
milani
rmontro
Latest posts
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
1 minute ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 4:49 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
F
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Firethorn1001
Yesterday at 1:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Yesterday at 11:53 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Free Agency Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top