Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 875290" data-attributes="member: 12283">It makes absolutely no sense to laud the 49ers' offense and simultaneously criticize LaFleur for bringing the same system to Green Bay. Of the following, you have to pick one:1) The 49ers offense is really good-- better than the Packers.2) Hiring LaFleur was the wrong decision if he wants to tie his passing offense to the run game.Those two statements completely contradict one another. It's the same system. You know who has invested a lot of cap space in a lead blocker and running backs? The 49ers. On of the first things Shanahan asked Lynch to do was invest an eyebrow raising contract in Jusczcyk. When a RB hit the market that he thought would work well in the offense, Jerick McKinnon, they gave him 4/30. Shoot, they reportedly traded up to take Aiyuk based on intel that the Packers were going to do it if they didn't get to him first. Here's what would be "the wrong decision": Hiring LaFleur to install this offense and then refusing to get him the pieces that he needs to run it properly and moving on because it happens that this offense ties the pass to the run. The offense works. He's had one season.</blockquote>

Total: 621 (members: 1, guests: 620)