Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 875199" data-attributes="member: 12283">1. Of course... I've said as much from the start. 2. I'd say that RB and CB about a wash, but OT yes.3. I don't know. 4. Dillon will play immediately. Health permitting, it would be 4 years minimum. 5. If a RB plays really well for you for four seasons and then walks, then the ROI at #62 is fine. 6. Maybe I do and maybe I don't. I don't know that we've disagreed so much about RB value. I just have a realistic perspective on where you typically find good running backs. You think it's far easier to find them later than it actually is.Last thing I would add-- if the Packers had an OT on the board at #62 that they valued comparably to Dillon, then they should have taken that player. We can't know that. Positional value is a factor, but if you simply force an edge, OT, or CB into every top selection, you're going to end up selecting a lot more busts.</blockquote>

Total: 625 (members: 1, guests: 624)