Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jess" data-source="post: 242914" data-attributes="member: 1495">Hester 6, Forte 6, Olson 9, Davis 4, assorted other people get the rest of his TD passes. They're going to draft a good WR to go with Hester. There's tremendous depth this year at that position. And Hester, if he so chooses, could run right by Woodson. Randy Moss made a living running right by corners, now that Hester has someone capable of throwing the ball to him, Hester can do the same. I'm not saying Hester is the next Randy Moss, but I think Cutler makes Hester a good receiver and the biggest deep threat in the league. The Bears have a few decent receivers, it's not like he's throwing to total crap. Olsen is going to be great, hell Cutler made Tony Scheffler look great last year. Hester will improve and become a viable threat, Rasheen Davis is a solid receiver, Matt Forte is a fantastic receiver out of the backfield, Earl Bennett could have a breakout year, he was a high draft pick for them last year. Like it or not, Cutler has options. As far as defenses go, being old as the hills on D never stopped New England from playing good D, I don't see why it stops Chicago. I think a lot of what has led to Chicago being worse on D lately is that the D thought they had to win them games because of the lack of a decent offense. They now have a decent offense. Pressure is off the defense. They can loosen up, they can play knowing they're going to get production out their offense. I think that's a big mental edge for them over last year. As far as the o-line goes, Cutler had crap in Denver too. It got him used to having to get rid of the ball fast, which he does. I see the o-line having no effect on him. He wasn't sacked often in Denver, he won't be sacked often in Chicago. And I like the "we only have to fix 2 positions" stuff. How have we done so far this offseason with fixing those problems? The draft is a crapshoot, we may fix a problem there, we may draft Jamal Reynolds again. And i'll readily acknowledge that Chicago might not get a game changing receiver in the draft, I still think even without an impact rookie that their WR's and TE's are better than people give them credit for. It'd be tough to look good with Grossman throwing the ball. Same with Orton. All I know is that everyone else in our division is attempting, at the very least, to use every avenue they can to get better, like free agency and trades. We only draft. There's something fundamentally wrong with that.Don't get me wrong, I love the Packers, but i'm a realist. I don't see things through green and gold glasses. I think Chicago just made themselves really really good, doesn't mean I won't root my heart out for the Packers to beat them twice this year.</blockquote>

Verification

Members online

Total: 91 (members: 4, guests: 87)

Latest posts

NFC North Predictions
- Latest: DoURant
- 19 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
First Round Pick #23 - Matthew Golden WR - Texas
- Latest: OldSchool101
- Today at 3:46 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Roster - Semi Live Thread
- Latest: Pokerbrat2000
- Today at 2:11 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Post Draft/UDFA/Off-Season Signings - Each Position Trade Block
- Latest: Pkrjones
- Today at 11:46 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Schedule Release
- Latest: DoURant
- Today at 10:06 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum