Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assuming no other FA signings, where do you think we'll finish this season?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 718515" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>Well we have to define "significant" but yeah I do. That's typically what happens with such outstanding offenses.</p><p></p><p>The 2013 Broncos went from 37.9 points/game to 30.1 2014.</p><p></p><p>The 2011 Packers went from 35 to 27 in 2012. </p><p></p><p>The 2012 Patriots went from 34.8 to 27.8 in 2013. </p><p></p><p>The 1998 Vikings went from 34.8 to 24.9 in 1999.</p><p></p><p>The 2011 Saints went from 34.2 to 28.8 in 2012. </p><p></p><p>The 2004 Colts went from 32.6 to 27.4 in 2005.</p><p></p><p>There are exceptions. The Patriots maintained ~32 from 2010-11. </p><p></p><p>The Rams maintained ~33 from 1999 to 2000.</p><p></p><p>However, of the top 10 (excluding 2007 Pats b/c they lost Brady in '08 and obvious the '16 Falcons), there was an average regression of 5.6 points per game. If that applied to the Falcons, that would take them from 33.8 per game to 28.2.</p><p></p><p>The bottom line is that regression for elite units is normal. Then you consider that they lost maybe the best OC in the game and yeah, I totally expect significant regression.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 718515, member: 12283"] Well we have to define "significant" but yeah I do. That's typically what happens with such outstanding offenses. The 2013 Broncos went from 37.9 points/game to 30.1 2014. The 2011 Packers went from 35 to 27 in 2012. The 2012 Patriots went from 34.8 to 27.8 in 2013. The 1998 Vikings went from 34.8 to 24.9 in 1999. The 2011 Saints went from 34.2 to 28.8 in 2012. The 2004 Colts went from 32.6 to 27.4 in 2005. There are exceptions. The Patriots maintained ~32 from 2010-11. The Rams maintained ~33 from 1999 to 2000. However, of the top 10 (excluding 2007 Pats b/c they lost Brady in '08 and obvious the '16 Falcons), there was an average regression of 5.6 points per game. If that applied to the Falcons, that would take them from 33.8 per game to 28.2. The bottom line is that regression for elite units is normal. Then you consider that they lost maybe the best OC in the game and yeah, I totally expect significant regression. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
milani
gopkrs
Pkrjones
Latest posts
The Indiana Bears?
Latest: milani
A moment ago
NFL Discussions
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
30 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 2:51 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 1:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 11:57 AM
Movies and Entertainment
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assuming no other FA signings, where do you think we'll finish this season?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top