Thirteen Below
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2022
- Messages
- 888
- Reaction score
- 639
Thanks; yeah... that's the reason I like it so much (for those who don't know, the Drafttek chart I linked is the Rich Hill chart). The values are recalculated when major transactions are completed (sometimes every few days), and (unlike the algorithms used in the Jimmy Johnson chart) it's designed to factor in the internal scoring systems used by individual teams, to the extent that it's able to. So in a sense, it's adaptive not only to changing real-time circumstances, but also to variables like the way individual teams themselves utilize the chart.Now to be fair, the most realistic trade chart to value is the Rich Hill one, because he's constantly reviewing actual trades and updating. Now of course you have QB driven trades which in all reality is a world all alone. But Rich's have always seemed to be fair closer to reality than many.
So really, the Rich Hill model itself already factors in Green Bay's internal valuation model. Sticking to your own way is all well and good, but when making a deal with another team, you still have to take into consideration their way of calculating vaklue, which the Rich Hill chart is designed to do (to a limited extent).
I just thought of something.... if the chart factors in the patterns of individual teams and combines them to make a general model, I wonder if it can be refined on a case by case basis - for example, if Green Bay is thinking of a trade with Seattle, could the algorithms be tweaked to consider that Team A calculates values a certain way, whereas Team B weights values a different way, so what is the most likely way the two teams would find common ground?
Probably way too complicated.
I wonder what Vince Lombardi would have thought about all this crap...
Last edited: