10 more points and the Packers would be 5-1

[net]

http://www.jsonline.com/packer/news/oct05/366324.asp

Scroll the space above.

 

[CaliforniaCheez]

No, 4 games lost by 9 points means that it would take at least 13 more points to win those 4 games.

 

[digsthepack]

Woulda, coulda, shoulda......

 

[P@ck66]

they don't have another guy who can hold the damn ball correctly?

another gaff by Sherman (as usual) in not getting this thing corrected....

you can be sure as sh** if i were head coach...i'd have personnel in there who can do the job..jeez...

(maybe they should sign Pederson just to hold...)

 

[digsthepack]

Net...your comments are bringing me back in time to that long forgotten and little missed period known as "The Lindy Infante Era". That is a hugely weak rationalization for this teams failures.

 

[Chamuko]

Two more Wheels and my mother in law will be a bicycle.

ONE GOOD HC WITH BALLS AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN TO A COUPLE OF SB... PLEASE TT FIRE SHERMY ASAP.

 

[tarkenton10]

Couldas, wouldas, and shoulda!!! If we had eight points last year we would have been north champs and not you guys. So it doesn't really mean much. There are a lot of teams that could say if they had ten points they could be 5-1 or 6-0 0r even 4-2. The reality is that in the NFL alot of games are won by a slim margin, most fans have that same feeling that their team could have a winning record.

 

[arrowgargantuan]

Couldas, wouldas, and shoulda!!! If we had eight points last year we would have been north champs and not you guys. So it doesn't really mean much. There are a lot of teams that could say if they had ten points they could be 5-1 or 6-0 0r even 4-2. The reality is that in the NFL alot of games are won by a slim margin, most fans have that same feeling that their team could have a winning record.

so true...there is definitely no room for almost in the NFL. losing 4 games by a combined 9 points means we kept our losses nice and close. i can find an inkling of consolation in that, but thats it.