Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
1 Year Ago, Lynch may not have been a popular pick...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="all about da packers" data-source="post: 144777" data-attributes="member: 227"><p>Last year, when the ZB scheme was announced, a lot of people on this board liked the idea because of 2 main reasons: O-linemen could be found easier and <strong>a lesser talented RB could excel in the scheme</strong>.</p><p></p><p>We had seen Denver constantly take RBs other teams overlooked, and turn them into stars. </p><p></p><p>Sure a lesser talented RB wouldn't scare the opposition terribly, but the end result would be the that we'd be able to get quality production from talent that would be second and third tier. </p><p></p><p>One year later, we are seeing a lot of people saying the Packers will (and should) draft Lynch. </p><p></p><p>Is it really necessary? Wasn't one of the reasons people were so excited about the new scheme was because we wouldn't need to necessarily find a RB in the first round, and thus we could look at other positions for improvement.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Given that, should the Packers think twice about selecting Lynch if he is there at the 16th pick?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="all about da packers, post: 144777, member: 227"] Last year, when the ZB scheme was announced, a lot of people on this board liked the idea because of 2 main reasons: O-linemen could be found easier and [b]a lesser talented RB could excel in the scheme[/b]. We had seen Denver constantly take RBs other teams overlooked, and turn them into stars. Sure a lesser talented RB wouldn't scare the opposition terribly, but the end result would be the that we'd be able to get quality production from talent that would be second and third tier. One year later, we are seeing a lot of people saying the Packers will (and should) draft Lynch. Is it really necessary? Wasn't one of the reasons people were so excited about the new scheme was because we wouldn't need to necessarily find a RB in the first round, and thus we could look at other positions for improvement. Given that, should the Packers think twice about selecting Lynch if he is there at the 16th pick? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Raleigh NC Packers Fan
Pkrjones
BigCheese
rmontro
Latest posts
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: milani
23 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: DoURant
54 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 7:18 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 6:50 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: DoURant
Today at 6:41 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
1 Year Ago, Lynch may not have been a popular pick...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top