I
I asked LT to delete my acct
Guest
There`s a great barber......Ya scruffy bum.You must be logged in to see this image or video!
There`s a great barber......Ya scruffy bum.You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Started at 11What time is McAfee's show?
I'd be really surprised to see him retire. Which doesn't mean he won't, but I'd be surprised.Seems like the consensus from the guys on the Pat M show as well as Ian Rapoport....Rodgers is either announcing his retirement or that he is staying in Green Bay. Makes sense.
In the short term, the Packers are a much better team with Rodgers. I am not so sure about long term and a lot of that will have to do with what they do with other players and the cap in the next 3 months.I'd be really surprised to see him retire. Which doesn't mean he won't, but I'd be surprised.
Unless the Packers actually don't want him back, and that's his out. But I think if Rodgers is willing, the Packers will want to keep him. It's a good business move at least, whether it's a good football move or not (although I believe it is).
We haven't raised the bar of intelligence in the thread yet?How did this thread not get moved to the Aaron Rodgers sub-forum like all the rest?
shh. I pretty much read this forum and that’s it. if it gets moved. I’ll get my Rodgers news somewhere else.How did this thread not get moved to the Aaron Rodgers sub-forum like all the rest?
I just hope Rodgers doesn't get Covid again or it will be moved and shut down.shh. I pretty much read this forum and that’s it. if it gets moved. I’ll get my Rodgers news somewhere else.
There's definitely a valid argument for blowing it up and starting over, you just never know if that's going to work or if it's going to open another 25 years of futility. With Rodgers, we're a playoff team at least, most likely. And I don't think there's anything wrong with showing a HOF QB a little loyalty, especially one that's still playing at a high level - although I can understand why a lot of people think that shouldn't enter into it.In the short term, the Packers are a much better team with Rodgers. I am not so sure about long term and a lot of that will have to do with what they do with other players and the cap in the next 3 months.
dont call me scruffy... the rest is spot on.There`s a great barber......Ya scruffy bum.
looks like Mr. Rodgers may have fibbed about Shailene...she was heard laughing in the background the other day...like the sands through the hour glass, these are the days of 12's lies.
Wouldn't shock me if they are just fine and dandy and loving the incorrect gossip that's floating around about them. AR will just use it as further proof that you shouldn't believe what you read online.To be fair it was only said they called their engagement off. It was never made crystal clear that they no longer are dating or talking…which he made it kinda clear that they are still friends and he thinks the world of her.
If you're talking about the McAfee show, Pat pointed out that they heard laughing in the background and AR said it was the TV.looks like Mr. Rodgers may have fibbed about Shailene...she was heard laughing in the background the other day...like the sands through the hour glass, these are the days of 12's lies.
If you watch Aaron's face when he said it was the TV, I don't even think Pat believed him. Considering that we never hear "the TV", any other time during that long chat, I definitely think there was a woman nearby. Now if it was Shay or not, who knows.If you're talking about the McAfee show, Pat pointed out that they heard laughing in the background and AR said it was the TV.
I agree that it's not completely Rodgers' fault that the offense did not play well. Also, I wasn't saying it was Rodgers' fault that ST was terrible. I'm saying that blame should be assigned in terms of how a unit performed compared to how we expected them to perform. We knew ST was terrible, so we shouldn't be surprised they performed terribly in the game. But Rodgers' and the offense's overall performance in the game was surprisingly bad.
1. Suffer for an extra season or two in the near future $Cap$ wise from money transitioning additional debt into the future on multiple players.
3. We highly likely part with 3-4 good starting caliber players due to financial constraints, such as
A top 5 ILB in FA OR Top 25 CB
Atop 10 OLB in FA
A A Starting caliber veteran TE
A starting caliber #3 WR
A #4 type WR
A starting caliber RT
On the bright side we likely get 3 more seasons of #12 slinging the ball, (my prediction is a 4 year rework with a 4th yr “out”)but with a very gradual waning of talent surrounding him each season. My prediction is we can keep our head above water 2 seasons and then we sink from the wake of other teams speeding by us with double 250HP engines.
So my question back to you. Do you believe roughly 2 seasons (3 tops) is worth that opportunity cost??
If we re-up with #12. I think GB should go out and draft 1 more OL by round 2. One that takes our weak link and makes it our strength. Newman isn’t ready yet.
Once other teams highly respect our rushing phase, it will open up things closer to a 2020 Type version. If we start getting better run blocking I think you’ll see our O get back inside the top 5-7 production range (or better).
Much of our woes started upfront on OL due to injury and departure of Corey. We regressed heavily from 2020 and it showed in our inability to run effectively. Just 18th in Rushing yards is embarrassing and it reflected in our major regression (8th passing). Our RB group should be top 5 and our passing top 3.