Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
the root of the problem ...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hauschild" data-source="post: 250131" data-attributes="member: 1638"><p>I certainly agree to an extent. He has intentionally disregarded the O-line, or has failed miserably when drafting O-lineman.</p><p></p><p>That would be slightly acceptable if TT would have acquired some GOOD veteran talent - not just a body like Duke Preston and Adrian Klemm.</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure how anybody could possibly argue that TT's handling of the O-line has been acceptable. Let's all at least try to remain kool-aid-free on this one.</p><p></p><p>To me, TT is a classic example of a fly-by-nite outfit. He continually tries to undercut and in specific aspects like the O-line his products are substandard. Yet, he prices his product and contributes to R&D like his product will never be matured or irrelevant, or have no demand for.</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure how many more years of substandard O-line play TT must produce before we begin holding his feet to the fire. His nickel-dime approach is getting old, quickly.</p><p></p><p>Now, the hole TT has dug for himself will be more difficult to dig out of. Now, if he uses a first round pick on an O-lineman in 2010, it's almost too late, as most of his draft picks do not produce consistently in the first or second year. See Rodgers/Colledge/Spitz/Collins/Murphy/Harrell.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hauschild, post: 250131, member: 1638"] I certainly agree to an extent. He has intentionally disregarded the O-line, or has failed miserably when drafting O-lineman. That would be slightly acceptable if TT would have acquired some GOOD veteran talent - not just a body like Duke Preston and Adrian Klemm. I'm not sure how anybody could possibly argue that TT's handling of the O-line has been acceptable. Let's all at least try to remain kool-aid-free on this one. To me, TT is a classic example of a fly-by-nite outfit. He continually tries to undercut and in specific aspects like the O-line his products are substandard. Yet, he prices his product and contributes to R&D like his product will never be matured or irrelevant, or have no demand for. I'm not sure how many more years of substandard O-line play TT must produce before we begin holding his feet to the fire. His nickel-dime approach is getting old, quickly. Now, the hole TT has dug for himself will be more difficult to dig out of. Now, if he uses a first round pick on an O-lineman in 2010, it's almost too late, as most of his draft picks do not produce consistently in the first or second year. See Rodgers/Colledge/Spitz/Collins/Murphy/Harrell. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Schultz
Emur
Guacamole
gopkrs
tynimiller
Latest posts
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Guacamole
3 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: tynimiller
14 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: DoURant
23 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: DoURant
Today at 5:26 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 3:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
the root of the problem ...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top