Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs and duds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HyponGrey" data-source="post: 483189" data-attributes="member: 6441"><p>I'm sorry, you are obviously reading MM's mind, and there is obviously no reason behind his decisions. He couldn't have been trying to accomplish something, and I am giving the opposition entirely too much credit by saying they stopped us. It was also insulting to say that we could be stopped by any adjustments that anybody made, or to imply that MM could possibly be struggling to make/overcome adjustments in the third quarter. Because those things never happen.</p><p> </p><p>You should really talk to MM about all that 3 man rush he calls on defense. I remember back when we were so excited about it in TC, and then were disappointed we didn't see it for a while. Then we saw it in action when it wasn't a hail mary situation, and were like "this was a dumb idea." I understand the concept is to double every receiver, but it breaks down too fast. It would be a good call if we could execute it, but a good DC should know not to call something the team routinely fails to execute.</p><p> </p><p>BTW, deep bombs all day is pretty much all we do when we pass, it's been pointed out that AR ignores the open short route. BTW out routes are likely to end up out of bounds, stopping the clock. Wouldn't mind seeing us actually throw to the open short middle.</p><p> </p><p>Whether or not he actually pulled off the gas, we don't know, though I'll give you it looked like it. Why not pull off the gas? Why give the 49ers even more info on us? Why waste plays on a Vikings team we own that obviously is not scoring unless we put Hawk in man on a deep route from a WR? No, I want coaches watching Vanilla the entire half unless we have to switch out. Because 21 points is a "modest lead." Be glad I'm not making the calls, because in that case after we make a stop while up by 14 the game gets boring.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HyponGrey, post: 483189, member: 6441"] I'm sorry, you are obviously reading MM's mind, and there is obviously no reason behind his decisions. He couldn't have been trying to accomplish something, and I am giving the opposition entirely too much credit by saying they stopped us. It was also insulting to say that we could be stopped by any adjustments that anybody made, or to imply that MM could possibly be struggling to make/overcome adjustments in the third quarter. Because those things never happen. You should really talk to MM about all that 3 man rush he calls on defense. I remember back when we were so excited about it in TC, and then were disappointed we didn't see it for a while. Then we saw it in action when it wasn't a hail mary situation, and were like "this was a dumb idea." I understand the concept is to double every receiver, but it breaks down too fast. It would be a good call if we could execute it, but a good DC should know not to call something the team routinely fails to execute. BTW, deep bombs all day is pretty much all we do when we pass, it's been pointed out that AR ignores the open short route. BTW out routes are likely to end up out of bounds, stopping the clock. Wouldn't mind seeing us actually throw to the open short middle. Whether or not he actually pulled off the gas, we don't know, though I'll give you it looked like it. Why not pull off the gas? Why give the 49ers even more info on us? Why waste plays on a Vikings team we own that obviously is not scoring unless we put Hawk in man on a deep route from a WR? No, I want coaches watching Vanilla the entire half unless we have to switch out. Because 21 points is a "modest lead." Be glad I'm not making the calls, because in that case after we make a stop while up by 14 the game gets boring. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
GreenBaySlacker
Raleigh NC Packers Fan
Green_Bay_Packers
Pkrjones
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
6 minutes ago
Draft Talk
G
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
6 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: Sanguine camper
23 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: DoURant
26 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: DoURant
32 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Studs and duds
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top